Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

proposition: x∈The Jacobson radical <=> 1-xy is a unit in commutative ring A for all y∈A

I have proved (=>)

I don't figure out a detail of the proof of (<=).

Here is the proof on book:

suppose x∉m for some maximal ideal m.

then m and x generate the unit ideal (1). (*Why?*It's the only thing I confused about in this proof)


Here is what I thought:

(m) is still (m)


so I only need to prove that (A-m)x=A-m

Then I stuck at here .

share|cite|improve this question
Isn't it just that since $ m $ is maximal, the only ideal containing $ m\cup\{x\} $ is the unit ideal? – Unwisdom Feb 25 '14 at 22:59
up vote 1 down vote accepted

By definition $\mathfrak{m} \subset A$ is maximal if and only if for all other ideals $I$ for which $ \mathfrak{m} \subseteq I \subseteq A$ holds, either $I = \mathfrak{m}$ or $I = A$.

The ideal $(\mathfrak{m}, x)$, generated by $\mathfrak{m}$ and $x$ indeed sits in between $\mathfrak{m}$ and $A$ as above, i.e. $$ \mathfrak{m} \subseteq (\mathfrak{m}, x) \subseteq A. $$ However, it cannot be equal to $\mathfrak{m}$, as $x \not \in \mathfrak{m}$. Therefore $(\mathfrak{m},x) = A$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.