Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $l(z)=z \bar z$ be a norm function.

How can one perform prime factorization in the rings $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, $\mathbb{Z}[\frac{-1 \sqrt{-3}}2]$ or any other ring using the norm function?

For example, how can one find prime factorization of $8+i \in \mathbb{Z}[i]$ or $13 \in \mathbb{Z}[\frac{-1 \sqrt{-3}}2]$?

Any help would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
    
Why do you think this should be possible at all? Are there any hints you have been given? –  Joe Tait Feb 23 at 16:02

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

If $R$ is a ring, $a,b\in R$ such that $a\mid b$, then we have $b=ak$ for some $k\in R$, and if $\mathsf{N}:R\to\mathbb{Z}_{\geq 0}$ is a norm function, then we have $$\mathsf{N}(b)=\mathsf{N}(ak)=\mathsf{N}(a)\mathsf{N}(k)\;\;\implies \;\;\mathsf{N}(a)\mid \mathsf{N}(b).$$ As an example, if we take $R=\mathbb{Z}[i]$ and $\mathsf{N}(a+bi)=a^2+b^2$, then $$\mathsf{N}(8+i)=8^2+1^2=65=5\cdot 13.$$ So if $$8+i=u\;\pi_1^{d_1}\cdots\pi_n^{d_n}$$ is the factorization into irreducibles of $8+i$ in the ring $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ ($u$ being a unit), we have that $$\mathsf{N}(8+i)=65=\mathsf{N}(\pi_1)^{d_1}\cdots\mathsf{N}(\pi_n)^{d_n}.$$ Now, I leave it to you to check that we cannot have $\mathsf{N}(\pi)=65$ for any irreducible $\pi\in\mathbb{Z}[i]$ (do you know the classification of irreducibles in $\mathbb{Z}[i]$?) But from this, we see that $$8+i=u\;\pi_1\pi_2$$ where $\mathsf{N}(\pi_1)=5$ and $\mathsf{N}(\pi_2)=13$, and $u\in\{\pm1,\pm i\}$. Now just solve for the real and imaginary parts of $\pi_1$ and $\pi_2$... except for the fact that there are two potential $\pi_1$'s and two potential $\pi_2$'s (up to multiplication by a unit), each potential being the conjugate of the other: $$\pi_1\in\{2\pm i\},\quad \pi_2\in\{3\pm 2i\}.$$ Here I think you must guess and check (at least, I don't remember any way of deducing which conjugate we need).

share|improve this answer
    
Some ways of checking are nicer than others. Instead of doing straight division by $2+i$, say, you could look at the original number mod $2+i$. Keeping in mind that ${\mathbf Z}[i]/(2+i) \cong {\mathbf Z}/(5)$, with $i \equiv -2 \equiv 3$, we have $8+i \equiv 8+3 = 11 \equiv 1 \not\equiv 0$, so $2+i$ is not a factor: $2-i$ has to be. –  KCd Feb 23 at 16:15
    
How did you know to give $\pi_2$ the values $3+- 2i$? I personally thought right away on $\sqrt{12} +- i$ –  user130955 Feb 23 at 16:28
    
@user130955: Like I said, solve for the real and imaginary parts. If $\mathsf{N}(a+bi)=13$, what can $a$ and $b$ be? This will give you 8 possibilities for the element $a+bi$, but you don't care about units, so there are only 2 fundamentally different options (e.g., $3$ is an irreducible in $\mathbb{Z}[i]$, but if I solve for $\mathsf{N}(a+bi)=9$ I could have $\pm3, \pm 3i$; I would just choose $3$ since if it were any of the others, the unit can be placed in the $u$ in the factorization.) –  Zev Chonoles Feb 23 at 16:32
    
Oh.. got it. Thanks ! –  user130955 Feb 23 at 16:37

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.