Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a statement,

Either p or q

and I have to write it in terms of logical connectives but I don't get which logical connector should I be using? Here is what I did (I think there could have been a better way to do this)

$(p \lor q ) \land (\neg((p \Rightarrow q) \land (q \Rightarrow p)))$

share|cite|improve this question
If by "either or" you mean in particular not both, might as well say it directly, $(p \lor q)\land \lnot(p \land q)$. Complicated combinations that involve implication can be hard to read. I think. There are other sensible ways. More symmetric would be $(p\land \lnot q) \lor (q\land \lnot p)$. – André Nicolas Sep 28 '11 at 22:12
(Added) If, again, you mean exclusive or, then your sentence works, but even better, part of it works. Look at $\lnot((p \to q)\land (q\to p))$. This holds if $p$ is true and $q$ is false, or vice-versa. So well done, except for the unnecessary $p \lor q$ part. But it took me a few seconds of looking to realize this, because the connective $\to$ is somehow less intuitive. (The connectives $\lor$ and $\land$ are closely connected to the geometric notions of union and intersection.) – André Nicolas Sep 28 '11 at 22:31
up vote 9 down vote accepted

To me, the word "either" is unnecessarily confusing, and should be avoided if possible (of course, since it is part of the problem we have no choice in this case).

If "either $p$ or $q$" means the same thing as "$p$ or $q$", then the answer is simply $p\vee q$ (by the definition of $\vee$).

However, if "either $p$ or $q$" means "either $p$ or $q$, but not both" then this is equivalent to "$p$ is true and $q$ is false, or $p$ is false and $q$ is true". Do you see how to write the logical expression for this?

share|cite|improve this answer
Let me give it a try, its (p ^ ~q) V (~p ^ q). Right? – Fahad Uddin Sep 28 '11 at 22:25
@Akito: Exactly right! :) – Zev Chonoles Sep 28 '11 at 22:25
My favorite ways to write the exclusive or are $\neg(p \Leftrightarrow q)$ ("$p$ and $q$ have different truth values"), or $\neg p \Leftrightarrow q$ and $p \Leftrightarrow \neg q$ ("$p$ and $q$ have opposite truth values"). – Omar Antolín-Camarena Sep 28 '11 at 22:40

If "Either p or q" means "p or q", then logical disjunction $p \lor q$ would do it, if "Either p or q" means not both, then exclusive disjunction is needed: $p \oplus q = (p\land \neg q)\lor (\neg p\land q) = (\neg p\lor \neg q)\land (p\lor q)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1, for mentioning XOR. I was wondering if that was going to be on this question. – Cᴏɴᴏʀ O'Bʀɪᴇɴ Sep 24 '15 at 3:08

There are several symbols for exclusive or, including $\oplus$ and $\veebar$. However, while in classical logic such connectives are both easily defined in terms of existing connectives and by means of a truth-table, they are not commonly employed in mathematics.

It's worth noting that there are many minimal functionally complete sets of logical connectives, but the definition of xor in terms of formulae using predefined connectives will be different in each. An obvious one is replacing $\phi \oplus \psi$ with $(\phi \vee \psi) \wedge \neg (\phi \wedge \psi)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Assuming I understand the question correctly (you're looking to describe "exclusive or"), hint: either p or q means p is true and not q, or (inclusive or) ...

You could also try draw the truth table.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.