Generally speaking, what are the necessary and sufficient properties of a matrix to make it a rotation matrix?
Is det(A) = 1 enough?
|
Generally speaking, what are the necessary and sufficient properties of a matrix to make it a rotation matrix? Is det(A) = 1 enough? |
|||
|
|
|
No, not by far. The matrix needs to be orthogonal, which means that $A^tA=I$ where $A^t$ is the transposed matrix -- and then it also has to have determinant 1. (You can think of orthogonality by considering how the matrix acts on the standard basis vectors -- since they were orthogonal to each other and had length 1 before the rotation, this must also be true after the rotation. But the vectors after-the-rotation are just the columns of $A$, and $A^tA=I$ is then a compact way to take the dot product of each pair of new vectors and see if they come out right, all in one operation). |
|||||||||
|
|
Not it is not. A rotation matrix is a square matrix with orthonormal columns and determinant 1. The set of all $n\times $n such matrices is commonly referred to as the special orthogonal group, and is denoted $SO(n)$. |
||||
|
|
|
In $\mathbb{R}^3$, one can prove that the set of all rotation matrices is precisely $SO_3(\mathbb{R})$. Assuming this fact, a rotation matrix $A$ with respect to the standard basis would then have the properties
In fact the properties above hold not just for the rotation matrices but for matrices in $O_3$ (and in general $O_n$ ) as well. It remains now to prove why the rotation matrices are exactly the matrices of $SO_3$. To prove it you need at least two facts:
|
|||
|
|