Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I understand correctly, $\Delta$-complex on a space $X$ is defined to be a collection $\Delta(X)$ of cont. funtions $\sigma:\Delta^n\to X$ such that:

1) restriction of $\sigma$ to any face is in $\Delta(X)$

2) restriction of $\sigma$ to the interior is injective

3) $A \subseteq X$ is open if every $\sigma^{-1}(A)$ is open

Can anyone explain me how a singular complex $S(X)$ can be regarded as a $\Delta$-complex considering the condition (2)? I have read some books but I still don't get it. Thank you for your help.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

The singular complex $S(X)$ is not $Δ$-complex structure on space $X$, but it is a completely new space constructed as a geometric realization of an abstract $Δ$-structure given by singular simplices of original space $X$.

Example: Take $X = \{*\}$ the one-point space. For each $n$ there is only one singular $n$-simplex – the constant one. The singular complex $Δ(X)$ looks as follows. It has one $n$-cell for each $n$. Each of them represents the corresponding $n$-simplex. So the $0$-skeleton of $Δ(X)$ is just a point. In $1$-skeleton, we glue a line segment to the point with both endings. In $2$-skeleton, we glue a border of a triangle to the line segment. Each segment of the border is glued to the only line in $1$-skeleton. The first one is glued forwards, the second one backwards and the third one forwards. We continue in this manner with all $n$-cells. So $Δ(X)$ of the one-point space is actually infinite-dimensional $Δ$-complex with one cell in each dimension.

share|cite|improve this answer
If I'm not mistaking, the point has singular simplex the final simplicial set $\Delta[0]$ whose geometric realisation is the point. I think you forgot in your description that each $n$-simplex with $n>0$ is actually degenerate. – Pece Aug 23 '14 at 20:52
@Pece: Yes, the singular simplices are degenerate in $X$, but not in $S(X)$ by definition. We are not giving a $Δ$-structure to $X$, but constructing a $Δ$-complex, simplicial chain complex of which is singular chain complex of $X$. – user87690 Aug 23 '14 at 21:08
Ok maybe we just have a conflict of definitions. For me, the singular simplicial complex of $X$ is the simplicial set $SX$ defined in every degree by $(SX)_n = \hom_{\mathsf{Top}}(\Delta^{\mathrm{top}}_n,X)$ where $\Delta^{\mathrm{top}}_n$ is the topological simplex of dimension $n$. The geometric realization $|-|$ is the left adjoint of $S$ : in particular, $|\Delta[n]| = \Delta^{\mathrm{top}}_n$. Then, we have $| S(\ast) | = | \Delta[0] | = \Delta^{\mathrm{top}}_0 = \ast$. – Pece Aug 23 '14 at 21:25
Yes, we have. The singular complex I'm talking about is a certain $Δ$-complex. It is defined on page 108 in Hatcher's book so one can regard singular chain complex of a topological space as simplicial chain complex of its singular complex (the word “complex” is used in two different meanings). – user87690 Aug 24 '14 at 8:24
@user87690 In 1-skeleton, we glue a line segment to the point with both endings. What does this sentence mean? Could you explain it to me? – Brooks Feb 21 at 9:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.