Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $k$ be a field, $A$ a finitely generated $k$-algebra, put $A^{G}:=\{a \in A \mid g(a)=a ~ \mbox{for all}~g \in G\}$, where $G$ is a finite group of automorphisms of $A$. If

(1) the order of $G$ is not divisible by the characteristic of $k$,

then $A^{G}$ is a finitely generated $k$-algebra.

I saw this statement in I. R. Safarevich's Basic Algebraic Geometry. But I don't know where (1) is used. In in Atiyah Macdonald's Commutative Algebra (exercise 5 of Chapter 7), Condition (1) is omitted.

I wonder what the correct statement is.

share|improve this question
    
Dear Sang Cheol Lee: I edited your question. I hope the changes I made are OK. I've already added your interesting question to my Google list about Atiyah-MacDonald. –  Pierre-Yves Gaillard Sep 26 '11 at 1:28
    
Thanks. Pierre-Yves Gaillard –  Sang Cheol Lee Sep 26 '11 at 1:40
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The condition on the characteristic is not necessary (nor is the condition that $k$ be a field, though it should be noetherian); see for instance Corollary 1.19 of http://people.fas.harvard.edu/~amathew/chgraded.pdf

Essentially, the point is that $A$ will be integral over $A^G$, and $A^G$ is "sandwiched" between $k, A^G, A$. From these facts, the result is not too complicated to prove.

The result that I only know under conditions on the characteristic is the strengthening to the case of $G$ a reductive algebraic group, acting (algebraically) on a finitely generated $k$-algebra: then $k$ is required to be of characteristic zero. The reason is that the proof uses semisimplicity of the category of $G$-representations, which is only true in characteristic zero.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Indeed the result is true with no restrictions on the characteristic: see $\S 14.6$, Theorem 339 of my commutative algebra notes. As I mention there, the result was first proved by Hilbert in characteristic zero and then in 1928 by Emmy Noether in arbitrary characteristic.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.