Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have found this tweet about git and don't know what to make of it.

I think it's written as a joke, but it could have been written in Chinese, and I'd understand about just as much.

Does this make any sense mathematically?

enter image description here

Or is it just as nonsensical as most "computer-speak" on most TV shows?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
3  
+1 for the GUI interface in Visual Basic –  Lightness Races in Orbit Feb 13 at 14:09
    
I prefer the AFIS fingerprint GUI client that wastes huge amounts of database and network to display loads of useless non-matches. –  Martin James Feb 13 at 14:12
    
@MartinJames: To be fair, even in reality you can somewhat imagine upper management saying "no no no, the user needs to see that progress is being made in the search!" –  Lightness Races in Orbit Feb 13 at 14:13
    
@LightnessRacesinOrbit - waiting for some lawyer to pop up and claim 'the AFIS system plainly is not effective because it displays non-matches - it doesn't know what it's doing! I move to dismiss all the fingerprint evidence from the axes and chainsaw'. –  Martin James Feb 13 at 14:20

1 Answer 1

This is an old joke that's done the rounds on the internet a few times.

Stephan Rauh gave it a pretty good treatment on his blog last year, in which he concludes that it is indeed nonsense:

Funny thing is it took me a while to figure out that the sentence really is utter nonsense. Most people immediately dismiss it as a joke – but they’ll never know for sure. It sounds oh so scientific. Mathematicians like me know what the words mean, and we know a lot of weird ways to make sense of them. So my first reaction was “It’s obviously a joke – but what’s the truth behind it?”.

Well, there’s none. Or rather, there is. You can make the branch operator a homeomorphic endofunctor living in a Hilbert space by defining a mapping from the set of all git repositories to the sequence space ℓ∞. You can achieve this easily by using the byte representations of the git repository.

You can do even simpler by interpreting the bytes a git repository consists of as a giant number. Thus every each git repository is an integer, i.e. an element of Z, which can easily embedded into a Hilbert space. Unfortunately the operations of the Hilbert space don’t map to a sensible operations on git repositories.

But still, it sounds intriguing. This much is true: the branch function is a surjective function mapping a git repository to another. Let’s use the commit operation as the addition. Obviously, the set of git repositories form an abelian group, but the branch operator isn’t a homomorphism. Actually, that’s good news, because it would be useless otherwise.

I had a lot of fun this afternoon to find out that almost every word of the sentence is nonsense:

  • branch() isn’t a functor but a function,
  • it’s not homomorphic, let alone homeophic,
  • it’s hard to see how the Hilbert space is defined and so on.
share|improve this answer
    
This is awesome. Thanks for the link :) –  Cristi Diaconescu Feb 13 at 14:13

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.