Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I was messing around with $i$ and I (haha) noticed that certain progressions arise when I keep on raising $i$ to $i$ to $i$ and so forth. Though, I am not really quite sure what is going on (and I don't have time to explore further).

In other words, is there an interesting pattern in the sequence:

$i$ , $i^i$, $i^{\left(i^i\right)}$, $i^{\left(i^{\left(i^i\right)}\right)}$, etc.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by GEdgar, Claude Leibovici, egreg, Macavity, Goos Mar 8 at 15:59

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

    
Comment: remember that $i^i$ is defined to be $e^{i\ln i} \cong e^{-\pi/2}$. I write $\cong$ instead of $=$ because this depends on your definition of $\ln$. This is very important, since different definitions of $\ln$ give us different values! –  Mike Miller Feb 11 at 21:25
    
$i^{i^i}$ is ill-defined just as $3^{3^3}$ is. $3^{(3^3)}=3^{27}\neq (3^3)^3=3^9$. First you got to define how you are raising powers. –  nayrb Feb 11 at 21:25
1  
Yes, it looks more and more like a group of people saluting you... But seriously, $i^i$ has many values... –  Vadim Feb 11 at 21:25
10  
@nayrb, since $(a^b)^c = a^{(bc)}$, the convention is that $a^{b^c} = a^{(b^c)}$. –  Peter Taylor Feb 11 at 21:27
1  
But from the wording of the question it sounds like the OP was inputting the following sequence into something: i ^ i= ^ i= ^i =^i =... This would give $(...(i^i)^i)...)^i)$, which should be 4-periodic up to picking a branch of exponentiation. –  Kevin Carlson Feb 11 at 21:33

1 Answer 1

up vote 10 down vote accepted

Actually the limit exists.

Define $a_0=i$, $a_{n+1}=i^{a_n}$, $\lim_{n\to\infty}a_n=\frac{W(-\ln(i))}{-\ln(i)}\approx0.4383+0.3606i$, where $W(z)$ is the Lambert W function, $\ln(z)$ is the principle branch of $\log(z)$.

More generally, for each $z\in\mathbb{C}$, we can define such sequence $a_n(z)$, the limit exists only if $\frac{W(-\ln(z))}{-\ln(z)}$ is defined and they are equal.

Also the proof isn't hard, just messing with the definitions.

Correct me if there is any mistakes, I am just retrospecting what I read in high school.

Reference:

  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert%27s_W_function

  2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetration

share|improve this answer
1  
Horey shit, those are some beautiful complex plots! Though currently a bit beyond me :P! –  Just_a_fool Feb 11 at 21:51
5  
If the limit $i^{i^{.^{.^.}}}$ exists, its value is $W(-\ln i)/(-\ln i)$. But you haven't proven that the limit exists. –  Rahul Feb 11 at 21:52
1  
@Rahul I didn't prove the limit exists, but I am sure someone did, just read the references in these two wiki pages. –  Kaa1el Feb 11 at 21:59
    
did you study that in high school? –  Ant Feb 11 at 22:01
5  
@Ant I read these for fun! –  Kaa1el Feb 11 at 22:02

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.