Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to wikipedia, "let $f$ denote a real-valued, continuous and strictly increasing function on [0, c] with c > 0 and f(0) = 0. Let $f^{−1}$ denote the inverse function of $f$. Then, for all a ∈ [0, c] and b ∈ [0, f(c)],"

$$ab \le \int_0^a f(x)\,dx + \int_0^b f^{-1}(x)\,dx$$

I am wondering: does the inequality reverse if $f$ is decreasing, and $f(a) =0$ ? (and, specifically with $a = b$, if that is necessary)

EDIT: I am pretty sure it neither holds nor reverses, as I can find examples of both. However, I don't understand why it doesn't hold. Consider $a=b=1$. If I take an increasing function $f$, where $f(0) =0$ and $f(1) = 1$, everything is fine. But if I redefine $f$ as $f_{new}(x) = f(1-x)$ then the function is decreasing and the inequality falls apart.. even though the integral of $f_{new}$ equals that of the old, and I would think the same must be true for the inverses...

share|cite|improve this question
Or, actually, now I think perhaps the inequality stays the same? I suppose more specifically, I am asking: Why does f need to be increasing? – Angada Sep 24 '11 at 19:54
Can you tell us exactly what your hypothesis is? You might want to consider $g(x)=f(a)-f(x)$ – Henry Sep 24 '11 at 19:58
First, why not try a few special cases? Second, if you think about the "chop the rectangle in half with some surplus" proof of Young's inequality, you should be able to figure out a version for decreasing functions (but you'll have to mess around with the integration limits, etc. a bit). Or just perform the transformation suggested by Henry (I think he means $f(0) - f(x)$). – user83827 Sep 24 '11 at 20:04
up vote 2 down vote accepted

If $f$ is strictly decreasing on $[0,c]$, then $-f$ is strictly increasing on $[0,c]$. Then, noting that the inverse of $-f(x)$ is $f^{-1}(-x)$ we get that for all $a \in [0,c]$ and $b \in [0,-f(c)]$

$ab \leq -\int_0^a f(x) dx + \int_0^b f^{-1}(-x) dx$

(some of the intervals in the theorem doesn't make sense unless we agree that $(a,b)=(b,a)$ when $b < a$)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.