Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a question: Can the vector $v = (1,2)$ be expressed as a linear combination of $u_1 = (1,3)$ and $u_2 = (4,1)$?

What I have tried:

$a + 4b = 1$

$3a + b = 2$

$a = 1 - 4b$

$3(1 - 4b) +b = 2$

$3 - 12b + b = 2$

$3 -11b=2$

$3 -2 = 11b$

$1 = 11b$

$b = 1/11$

$a + 4(1/11) = 1$

$a =1 - 4/11$

$a = 7/11$

Therefore, $v = 7/11x + 1/11y$

That's what I got but I know it's wrong because it doesn't seem right! Any help about how to go about doing this will be much appreciated!

share|cite|improve this question
You know it's wrong because "it doesn't seem right"? Well, that's not a very mathematical argument, is it? And BTW: it is correct. – DonAntonio Feb 11 '14 at 16:45

Your answer is indeed correct. You can (and should) always check your solution directly:

$$\frac{7}{11}(1,3) + \frac{1}{11}(4,1) = (\frac{7}{11},\frac{21}{11})+(\frac{4}{11},\frac{1}{11}) = (\frac{11}{11},\frac{22}{11}) = (1,2)$$

as desired.

It's generally true that as long as $u_2$ isn't a scalar multiple of $u_1$, you can find a unique linear combination of $u_1$ and $u_2$ to give any desired $v$. That's because the condition is exactly what it takes for $\{u_1,u_2\}$ to be a basis for $\mathbb{R}^2$.

share|cite|improve this answer

It's correct. You should try with row elimination next as it is much faster, and can be done in fewer steps.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.