Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Disclaimer: I am not a student trying to get free internet homework help. I am an adult who is learning Calculus from a textbook. I am deeply grateful to the members of this community for their time.

Here is the problem I am trying to solve:

The weight in pounds of a certain bear cub $t$ after birth is given by $w(t)$. If $w(2)=36, w(7)=84,$ and $\frac{dw}{dt}$ was proportional to the cub's weight for the first $15$ months of his life, how much did the cub weigh when he was $11$ months old?

A friend of mine emailed me his solution:

No calculus involved. $\frac{dy}{dy} = k y$ That implies $y=\exp(kt+C)$ One $(t,y)$ pair gives $k$, another gives $C$. You don't have to know the differentiation, just the result, hence, no Calculus.

Can someone decipher what he's saying? What is $\exp()$? Exponent? $y$ equals an exponent? Huh? I had no idea what he meant, and asked for clarification. His alternate solution was

If Diff. Eq. is of the form $\frac{dy}{dt} = ky$, then write solution as $y=$ $\exp(...)$ That's it!

I don't understand how this problem can be solved in just 1 line. It's clear that he's addressing this problem with a totally different approach than the traditional "Calculus/DiffEq" approach.

Below is is how I did it. Although I arrive at the correct answer after 10 mins. and an entire page of paper, I'd like to understand the 1-liner shortcut method above, as it seems a big time saver. Can anyone explain his approach written out legibly in a photo scan?

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this question
The next time you solve a similar problem you can start with equation $w=Ce^{kt}$ and substitute the given conditions. – Américo Tavares Feb 10 '14 at 22:16
What is the rationale behind starting directly with that equation? I see no mention of continuous compounding or exponential growth/decay in the original problem. What rule of thumb/shortcut am I unaware of? – JackOfAll Feb 10 '14 at 22:28
Because the solution of $dw/dt=kw$ is $w=Ce^{kt}$ as you computed. If $k=1$, then $w=Ce^{t}$. And if $w(0)=1$, then $w=e^{t}$, the exponential function. – Américo Tavares Feb 10 '14 at 22:32
Wait, the solution of dw/dt=kw is $w=Ce^{kt}$? How? This is how I understand derivatives: If the derivative of w is kw, then isn't the antiderivative/original function $y=\frac{k}{2}w^2$ ?? – JackOfAll Feb 10 '14 at 22:56
$$w=Ce^{kt}\Rightarrow \frac{dw}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}Ce^{kt}=C\frac{d}{dt} e^{kt}=Ce^{kt}k=kw.$$ – Américo Tavares Feb 10 '14 at 23:03
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Better to write this way: if $\dot w = k w,$ then $$ w = C e^{k t}. $$ You do not really need to solve for $k,$ because $$ w = C \left( e^k \right)^t. $$ So, if we define a positive real number $M = e^k,$ we get $$ w = M^t. $$

This one does not come out pretty. I guess you are taking an approximation.

Given $w(2)= 36, w(7) = 84,$ we have $$ C M^2 = 36, \; \; C M^7 = 84, $$ and $$ M^5 = \frac{84}{36} = \frac{7}{3}, $$ so $$ M = \sqrt[5]\frac{7}{3} \approx 1.184664 , $$ meanwhile $$ C = 36 / M^2 \approx 25.65144. $$ $C$ is the weight at birth.

Oh, well. Weight at 11 is $$ C M^{11} = C M^7 \cdot M^4 = 84 \cdot M^4 \approx 84 \cdot 1.969615 \approx 165.44769 $$

Maybe this will help: because $7-2 = 5,$ we get nice rational number weights at $t=2,7,12,17,22,$ and so on. $$ C M^{12} = 84 \cdot M^5 = 84 \cdot \frac{7}{3} = 196, $$ $$ C M^{17} = 196 \cdot M^5 = 196 \cdot \frac{7}{3} = \frac{1372}{3} = 457 + \frac{1}{3}. $$

The one with the 196 gives a way to confirm the answer, $$ C M^{11} = \frac{C M^{12}}{M} = \frac{196}{M} \approx \frac{196}{1.184664} \approx 165.44769 $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Imagine two cubs starting with weights $w_0$ and $w_1$. When for both of them ${dw\over dt}=c\, w(t)$ with the same proportionality constant $c$, then the weights of both of them multiply by the same factor within a week. From the data we conclude that this factor is $\left({84\over36}\right)^{1/5}$. Therefore in the remaining four weeks the cub increases his weight to $\left({84\over36}\right)^{4/5}\cdot 84=165.448$ pounds.

share|cite|improve this answer
Clever! Clever! – JackOfAll Jul 13 '14 at 12:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.