Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I don't know if this is an already existing conjecture, or has been proven: There is at least one prime number between $N$ and $N-\sqrt{N})$.

Some examples: $N=100$

$\sqrt{N}=10$ Between and 90 and 100, there is a prime: 97


$\sqrt{N}=6$ Between 30 and 36, there is a prime: 31


$\sqrt{N}=8$ Between 56 and 64, there are the primes: 59 and 61


$\sqrt{N}=3.46..$ Between 8.54 and 12, there is a prime: 11

If this hasn't been brought up before, I'm calling this the Dwyer Conjecture.

share|cite|improve this question
No prime lies in $[125-\sqrt{125},125]$, and ditto for $126$. – Ian Coley Feb 8 '14 at 23:31
Take $ 11 $. $ \sqrt{11} = 3.3166 $. $ 11 - \sqrt{11} = 7.6834 $. There is no prime from $ 7.6834 $ to $ 11 $ unless you include the upper limit as well. – hjpotter92 Feb 9 '14 at 14:30

the usual form of such things is to say that something is true for sufficiently large numbers. That is likely to be the case, but actual proofs, including the "sufficiently large" condition, have still not reached what you need. The best results are something like $x + x^{0.525};$ for large enough positive real number $x,$ there is guaranteed to be a prime between $x$ and $x + x^{0.525}.$

So, while everyone believes there is a prime between $x$ and $x + \sqrt x$ for sufficiently large $x,$ we may never be sure. Some very believable conjectures suggest that "sufficiently large" is $x \geq 5504. $ Does not make it true, just reasonable. I can tell you that the $x + \sqrt x$ thing is true for $5504 \leq x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{18}.$

share|cite|improve this answer

I'm afraid this is false whether we consider the strong form in which endpoints are allowed, or not. $\sqrt{126}<12$ and $113$ is the next prime below $126$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, Kevin Carlson, you found a counter example, and that is probably why the conjecture hasn't been brought out before. I wonder if my original conjecture can be modified to sometime that seems true. – RonDwyer Feb 9 '14 at 4:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.