Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to find x values for points along the normal distribution curve, and I ended up with a problem that goes back to the method of solving $x = \ln x$. Right now, I have $\ln(a \mu) - \ln(10) = \frac {-1} {2a^2} $. This is not something I know how to solve. I tried Googling this type of problem and nothing came up. How does one solve for a variable both inside and outside of a natural logorithm, specifically in the example problem above? Could anyone explain how this could be done?

share|cite|improve this question
If you are working with the Normal distribution, may I ask what $\mu$ is doing in the equation? You can usually specify to the standard normal distribution where $\mu=0$ and $\sigma=1$, and solve for things in that setting. Then use geometric rescaling and shifting to express the results in terms of arbitrary $\mu$ and $\sigma$. Is that doable in your original context? – alex.jordan Feb 8 '14 at 22:28
Note $\ln a\mu =\ln a+\ln \mu$ - is it $a$ that is unknown? – Mark Bennet Feb 8 '14 at 22:34
The idea is to derive a function for $a$ given a mean for the distribution, or $\mu$ – TheEnvironmentalist Feb 8 '14 at 22:51

There are no real numbers $x$ such that $x=\ln(x)$.

First of all, note that any such $x$ would need to be positive or $\ln(x)$ is not even defined. Since $x$ would need to be positive, so would $\ln(x)$, so that means $x$ would have to be greater than $1$.

Now consider two functions $f$ with $f(x)=x$ and $g$ with $g(x)=\ln(x)$. At input $1$, $f$ has a larger output: $f(1)=1$ and $g(1)=0$.

Forever onward (for all $x>1$) $f$ has a steeper slope: $f'(x)$ is constantly $1$, but $g'(x)=\frac1x$, is less than $1$. So the function $g$ that is already giving a lower output at input $1$ can never catch up with $f$ so that they have equal outputs.

You can get a great deal of clarity just by looking at the graphs of $y=x$ and $y=\ln(x)$ and observing that they never touch.

The equation $\ln(a\mu)-\ln(10)=\frac{-1}{2a^2}$ can be solved for $a$ numerically (to arbitrarily high decimal precision) using Newton's Method. Define $$f(a)=\ln(a\mu)-\ln(10)+\frac{1}{2a^2}$$ and we have $$f'(a)=\frac1a-\frac{1}{a^3}$$

Start with a decent guess $a_0$ for a solution, and then keep iterating $$a_{n+1}=a_n-\frac{f(a_n)}{f'(a_n)}$$ and the $\{a_n\}$ will converge to a solution. It generally converges fast, so you do not need too many iterations to get high decimal precision as long as you choose $a_0$ with a grain of care. Of course, you have to have a numerical value for $\mu$ to do this.

share|cite|improve this answer
The question is not about the solution to $x = \ln x$. The question is about how that type of problem, with unknown variables both inside and outside the natural log, would be solved – TheEnvironmentalist Feb 8 '14 at 22:23
Perhaps you should rephrase your question then. It's not clear what "that type of problem" means, especially since the defining example of $x=\ln x$ has no solutions. – alex.jordan Feb 8 '14 at 22:25
Sorry, I updated the question – TheEnvironmentalist Feb 8 '14 at 22:26

This kind of problem requires the use of the Lambert W function, which cannot be expressed with regular algebra but can be approximated with something like Newton's Method. However, since $x$ is linear and $\ln(x)$ is logarithmic (and at $x=1$, $\ln(x)$ is only at $0$ while $x$ is at $1$, and linear functions increase faster than logarithmic functions), there are no solutions for $x$.

share|cite|improve this answer
$x-1$ is also linear, but there would be a solution. Perhaps you can clarify? – abiessu Feb 8 '14 at 22:16
There are solutions, they can be found graphically. I can't seem to find solutions algebraically, or even with calculus, though. – TheEnvironmentalist Feb 8 '14 at 22:17
@abiessu I was just in the process of editing my answer – qwr Feb 8 '14 at 22:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.