2
$\begingroup$

I am considering an exponential on the following form:

$$\exp(X + A \otimes I_B),$$

where $X$ is a Hermitian operator on a tensor Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}_A \otimes \mathcal{H}_B$, $A$ is a Hermitian operator on $\mathcal{H}_A$, and $I_B$ is the identity opeartor on $\mathcal{H}_B%$. Furthermore, all Hilbert spaces are finite dimensional.

My question is now if there exists an operator $Z_A$ on $\mathcal{H}_A$, such that

$$\exp(X + A \otimes I_B) = \exp(X)Z_A\otimes I_B.$$

I am hoping that this might be the case, since I'm trying to factor out something that acts nontrivially on $\mathcal{H}_A$ only. I think a place to start might be the Zassenhaus formula, but I'm not sure. I only need to know about existence.

Update:

So here is my attempt at a proof. Since $[X,A\otimes I_B]$ should be an operator acting non-trivially on $\mathcal{H}_A$ only(?), the Zassenahus formula (linked to above), means we can write

$$\exp(X + A \otimes I_B) = \exp(X)\exp(A\otimes I_B)C_A\otimes I_B,$$

Where $C_A\otimes I_B$ is given by the infinite product of exponentials of nested commutators in the Zassenhaus formula. My biggest worry now is about the existence of this infinite product. I am guaranteed that the operator $C_A$ here is well-defined?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ If your operator $X=Y_A\otimes W_B$, Note $[X,A\otimes I_B]=[Y,A]\otimes W_B$, so your commutator does not act trivially on the B Hilbert space, albeit in an Abelian manner. $\endgroup$ Jan 4, 2019 at 17:55

0

You must log in to answer this question.