Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I have $\forall x: P(x)$, what is the equivalent function if I attach a not to the whole function:

$\neg (\forall x: P(x))$

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Read the statement out: not (for all x, p(x) holds). So if not for all x, there must be some x such that p(x) doesn't hold. So:

Then you have $\exists x : \lnot P(x)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
So the existential qualifier is the inverse of the universal quantifier? – David Feb 5 '14 at 6:56
No, read what I wrote carefully. If that were true, it wouldn't make any sense. – Newb Feb 5 '14 at 6:57
Oh I understand what you mean. So it would be like me saying not(for all x, x=2), therefore there exists some x, not(x=2) – David Feb 5 '14 at 6:59

you'll have $$\exists x: \neg P(x)$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.