Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If we have a non-zero abelian group A and $0\rightarrow{A}\rightarrow0$, am I correct in thinking $H_{0}(A)=A$? If so why because I'm a bit confused and to the image & kernel in this case...

share|improve this question
    
Are you saying $0\to A \to 0$ is exact? In this case, $A$ is just equal to $0$. –  Steven Gubkin Feb 2 at 19:07
    
I'm actually trying to show that something weird like $0\rightarrow{A}\rightarrow{0}\rightarrow{B}\rightarrow{0}$ where A & B are non-zero abelian groups cannot be exact.... so I was trying to just consider the case $0\rightarrow{A}\rightarrow0$ as I know that for $0\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow0$ we have that $H_{0}(\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$ –  Rhoswyn Feb 2 at 19:13
    
$0 \to A \to 0$ is exact means that the image of the first map is the kernel of the second map. The second map has kernel $A$, and the first map has image $0$. So if the image of the first is the kernel of the second, then $A = 0$. –  Steven Gubkin Feb 2 at 19:24
    
If $0 \to A \to 0$ is not exact, then the homology of this sequence is the kernel of the second map mod the image of the first map, which is just $A$. –  Steven Gubkin Feb 2 at 19:25
    
I will try to spell this out a bit nicer in an answer. –  Steven Gubkin Feb 2 at 19:25

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

A chain complex of abelian groups is just a sequence of maps

$...\to A_{-2} \to A_{-1} \to A_{0} \to A_1 \to A_2 \to ...$

with $d_n: A_n \to A_{n+1}$ and $d_{n+1} \circ d_n = 0$ for all $n$.

The homology of the complex is defined by $H_n = ker(d_{n})/im(d_{n-1})$. We say that the complex is exact at $n$ if $H_n = 0$, or in other words if the image of $d_{n-1}$ is the kernel of $d_n$.

So the homology of the complex $0 \to A \to 0$ at $n=0$ is $H_0 = A$, and the complex is exact iff $A = 0$.

Hopefully you have some intuition for why anyone would care about any of this stuff. The canonical example (which you would see in your first multivariable calculus class in a just world) is the de Rham complex. I will assume you have not seen differential forms. Here is an example:

Let $U = \mathbb{R}^2 = {(0,0)}$. Then

$0 \to C^{\infty}(U) \to C^\infty(U) \times C^\infty(U) \to C^\infty(U) \to 0$ is a nice complex, where the first map is given by the gradient operator $\nabla(f) = \begin{bmatrix} \frac{\partial f}{\partial x} \\ \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}\end{bmatrix}$, and the second map is given by the curl operator $curl\left(\begin{bmatrix} P(x,y) \\ Q(x,y)\end{bmatrix}\right) = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}$.

This is a chain complex because partial derivatives commute (do the computation!).

Now let us compute the homology groups.

$H_0 = \mathbb{R}$ because the kernel of the first map consists of just the locally constant functions. This is really just detecting that $U$ has only one connected component. Observe that if $U$ had $n$ several connected components, this homology group would have been $\mathbb{R}^n$.

$H^1$ is quite tricky. It turns out that $H^1 = \mathbb{R}^1$, and this is detecting the "hole" in the domain $U$. It is generated by the gradient of the "angle function", which is not defined on all of $U$, but the gradients do in fact patch up globally.

$H^2 = 0$. You should be able to do this exercise using what you know from multivariable calculus.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.