Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have a question about a step of a proof in Atiyah Macdonald. It's the proposition 2.4.

Let M be a finitely generate A-module, let a be an ideal of A, and let $ \phi $ be an A-module endomorphism of M such that $$ \phi \left( M \right) \subset aM $$ Then $\phi$ satisfies an equation of the form $$ \eqalign{ & \phi ^n + a_1 \phi ^{n - 1} + ... + a_n = 0 \cr & \text{ where }\ \ a_i \in a \cr} $$ enter image description here

I don't understand why the determinant annihilates each $x_i$ because I did not understand the step of the adjoint matrix.

share|cite|improve this question
Put $b=(b_{ij}):=(\delta_{ij}\phi-a_{ij})$. This is a matrix with coefficients in $A[\phi]$. Let $c=(c_{ij})$ be the adjugate of $b$. Then $$0=\sum_i\ c_{ki}\ \sum_j\ b_{ij}\ x_j=\sum_j\ \sum_i\ c_{ki}\ b_{ij}\ x_j=\sum_j\ \delta_{kj}\ \det(b)\ x_j=\det(b)\ x_k.$$ – Pierre-Yves Gaillard Sep 17 '11 at 15:45
Let $\pi:A^n\to M$ be the $A$-linear map characterized by $\pi(e_i)=x_i$, and $\Phi:A^n\to A^n$ the $A$-linear map given by the matrix $(a_{ij})$. We have $\pi\circ\Phi=\phi\circ\pi$, and thus $\pi\circ f(\Phi)= f(\phi)\circ\pi$ for any $f$ in $A[X]$. In particular, if $\chi$ is the characteristic polynomial of $\Phi$, Cayley-Hamilton implies $\chi(\phi)\circ\pi=0$, and the surjectivity of $\pi$ yields $\chi(\phi)=0$. – Pierre-Yves Gaillard Sep 17 '11 at 15:59
On such determinant tricks see also here. – Bill Dubuque Sep 17 '11 at 18:35
up vote 9 down vote accepted

For a square matrix $A$ with adjoint (or adjugate) matrix adj$(A)$, we have that $\textrm{adj}(A) A=A \textrm{adj}(A) = \textrm{det} (A) I$, where $I$ is the identity matrix.

Thus, in your case, let $A$ be the matrix such that $A_{ij} = \delta_{ij} \phi - a_{ij}$. It acts on $M^n$. Then, if $x = (x_1,\ldots,x_n)$, we have that $A x = 0$. Therefore, $\det(A) x=\textrm{adj}(A) A x =0$. This is what you were looking for, right?

See the wikipedia page for more on adjoint/adjugate matrices.

share|cite|improve this answer
On such determinant tricks see also here. – Bill Dubuque Sep 17 '11 at 18:37
But wait, I´m only a little confused, the determinant it´s a function that receives a homomorphism, and here , he is saying that the determinant vanishes in the generators, that are not homomorphism. Sorry for ask :S – Daniel Sep 17 '11 at 18:44
In this case, the determinant of $A$ can be seen as an endomorphism of $M$. – Gooz Sep 19 '11 at 6:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.