Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is known about (sets of) generators in an elementary topos ? In particular, does an elementary/Grothendieck topos have a dense set of generators ?

share|cite|improve this question

The fact that any Grothendieck topos has a dense generating set is more or less a tautology: after all, for any Grothendieck topos $\mathcal{E}$, there exist a small category $\mathcal{C}$ and a fully faithful embedding $\mathcal{E} \to [\mathcal{C}^\mathrm{op}, \mathbf{Set}]$, and we can always choose $\mathcal{C}$ so that the image of $\mathcal{E}$ contains the representable presheaves.

More generally, the following is a consequence of Giraud's theorem:

A complete/cocomplete locally small elementary topos is a Grothendieck topos if and only if it has a (small) generating set.

Of course, that means there are elementary toposes without generating sets. For instance, if $G$ is a non-small group, then $[G, \mathbf{Set}]$ is a complete/cocomplete locally small elementary topos that does not have a generating set.

share|cite|improve this answer

The effective topos is a counterexample. The topos of sets is embedded into the effective topos as its subcategory of indecomposable projectives. Meanwhile the effective topos lacks many infinite colimits.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.