Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to obtain these two Fourier transforms. First of all, I'm using the following definition of Fourier transform:


What I have so far is this:

To calculate Heavyside's Fourier transform, I am using that I know the Fourier transform of the sign function: $\displaystyle\cal{F}(sign)=\frac{2}{iy}$. So , as we can write The Heavyside function $H$ as $\displaystyle H(x)=\frac{sign(x)+1}{2}$, and using that $\cal{F}(1)=2\pi\delta$, i get:


To get the Fourier transform of the absolute value function, I'm trying to use that fact that we can write it in terms of the Heavyside, like this: $|t|=tH(t)-tH(-t)$.

Now, I use the relation $D(\cal{F}(f))=\cal{F}(-itf)$, which lets me write $\cal{F}(tH(t))=\frac{1}{-i}D(\cal{F}(H))=\frac{1}{-i}D(\frac{1}{iy}+\pi\delta)$.

Taking into account that the derivative of the Dirac's delta is $D(\delta)(\varphi)=-\varphi'(0)$, I have:


Now, using the fact that $\cal{F}(f)(ay)=|a|^{-1}\cal{F}(f)(a^{-1}y)$:


And combining these results I think we can say this:


I'm not sure if my reasonings are correct. Thanks a lot in advance for any help!

share|cite|improve this question
I realized that the last part, where I try to compute $\cal{F}(-tH(-t))(\varphi)$ is wrong. In essence, I would need some formula to compute the Fourier transform of the 'check' of a function (changing the sign of the variable). Any ideas? – Mark_Hoffman Jan 23 '14 at 19:45
Strangely enough, Mathematica insists that the coefficient at $\delta'$ is zero. – TZakrevskiy Jan 26 '14 at 14:30

I suggest to write $$|x|=-x+2xH(x).$$

$$\mathcal F[x] = \delta_0'$$ up to a multiplicative constant that depends on the notation convention for Fourier Transform.

Then again, to find $\mathcal F[xH(x)]$ one can use that fact that $(xH(x))'= H(X)$ and that $\mathcal F[H(x)](\xi)=vp(1/\xi) $ (again, up to another multiplicative constant). Now we need to divide it by $\xi$, which will give us $vp(1/\xi^2)$ and a term $C\delta_0$ with unknown $C$. However, the inverse Fourier transform would translate as $\delta'\to$ x, $\delta\to$ 1, and $vp(1/\xi^2)\to$ the discontinuity of derivative in zero, so I think it's possibble to show that $C=0.$

If you need help with formalising this approach, ask in comments.

Another approach would be to write $ix\,sign(x)=i|x|$, which implies that (up to some irrelevant multiplicative constant) $$\mathcal F[|x|](\xi) = -2 (v.p.(1/\xi))'.$$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.