Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm doing this exercise where I know that a function $f$ that is holomorphic in $U \cup V$, has a holomorphic antiderivative in $U$ and also another holomorphic antiderivative in $V$, where $U, V \subseteq \mathbb{C}$ are open sets such that $U \cap V \neq \emptyset$ and $U \cap V$ is connected.

Then the question is to prove that $f$ has a holomorphic antiderivative in the union $U \cup V$, and provide a counterexample to show that the hypothesis on the intersection $U \cap V$ are required for the result to be true.

My attempt

I thought that since there are holomorphic functions $F: U \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ and $G: V \rightarrow \mathbb{C}$ such that $F' = f$ in $U$ and $G' = f$ in $V$, then in the intersection both derivatives coincide so in $U \cap V$ we have $F' = G'$ and so $F = G + C$ in $U \cap V$, where $C$ is a constant. But now my problem is that I don't see how to extend this to the whole union $U \cup V$, and I don't see where I'll use the connectedness assumption.

So if you could help me with my argument I would be most grateful. By the way, if you could also give me a hint to construct a counterexample that would be great. Thanks.

share|improve this question
    
This is my first question but a friend who recommended the site to me gave me some suggestions on how to ask a question, I hope I did OK. –  Student Sep 15 '11 at 16:08
2  
+1 In fact, you did A-OK. :-) –  Srivatsan Sep 15 '11 at 16:13
1  
You already know that $F = G+C$ on the intersection. If $F$ is defined on $U$, and $G+C$ is defined on $V$,.. –  Soarer Sep 15 '11 at 16:34
    
Soarer, I thought about that, but I thought I was making a mistake because I'm not using anything about connectedness in that argument. –  Student Sep 15 '11 at 16:37
3  
On where you used connectedness: If $U \cap V$ is not connected, how did you get $F = G+C$? (constant for each connected component could be different.) –  Soarer Sep 15 '11 at 16:43

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Suppose $f(z)=1/z$. Let $U$ be the open upper half-plane plus a small area surrounding $1$ (say a small open disk of radius $1/10$) and another surrounding $-1$. Let $V$ be the open lower half-plane plus a small area surrounding $1$ and another surrounding $-1$.

Then $f$ has a holomorphic antiderivative on $U$ and another on $V$, but if I'm not mistaken, it has none on $U\cup V$.

share|improve this answer
1  
and the intersection is not connected ... so this example is what the OP needs to study! –  GEdgar Sep 16 '11 at 15:24

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.