Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An integral related to the zeta function at the point $2$ is given by

$$\zeta(2) = \int\nolimits_0^\infty \dfrac{t}{e^t - 1}\mathrm dt$$

How to calculate this integral?

share|cite|improve this question
Well... you already did (compute this integral), didn't you? Since you know its value. Or do you want a proof that it is indeed zeta(2)? – Did Sep 14 '11 at 13:12
@Dan: ?? $ $ $ $ – Did Sep 14 '11 at 13:15
Didier, throw a needle! – Dan Brumleve Sep 14 '11 at 13:17
Is the fact that the function being integrated is the generating function of the Bernoulli numbers of interest here? – Michael Hardy Sep 14 '11 at 14:04
@Michael Hardy: Yes it is of interest. We can see this directly with the "notion" of a negative Bernoulli number. (Non rigorous, it might be possible to make it rigorous though) The generating series fact can be reworded as $$B_n =\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{d^n}{dx^n} \frac{x}{e^x-1}.$$ In some "sense" the integral of $\frac{t}{e^t-1}$ should be like $B_{-1}$ since we would want to take $n=-1$. Recall as well that $-n\zeta(1-n)=B_n$ for positive $n$. If we "define" the negative Bernoulli numbers by that formula as well, then $B_{-1}=\zeta(2)$. Voilà. – Eric Naslund Sep 14 '11 at 15:02

The integrand can be expressed as a geometric series with first term $te^{-t}$ and common ratio $e^{-t}$. Integrate term-by-term (after justifying it, of course) and see if you don't recognize the result as $\zeta(2)$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Somewhat equivalent to Gerry's answer: let $t=-\log(1-u)$, giving the integral

$$-\int_0^1 \frac{\log(1-u)}{u}\mathrm du$$

Expand the logarithm as a series, swap summation and integration, and then you should be able to see something familiar...

share|cite|improve this answer
Or notice that this integral is the dilogarithm evaluated at $1$. Wait, I guess you prove that $\text{Li}_2 (1)=\frac{\pi^2}{6}$ by expanding the integral anyway so nevermind.... – Eric Naslund Sep 14 '11 at 13:33
@Eric: I didn't want to bring it up. You're right, of course. ;) – J. M. Sep 14 '11 at 13:34

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.