Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Suppose $A$ is a Noetherian ring, $I\subset A$ an ideal, and $M$ a finitely generated $A$-module. If $IM\neq M$, then the length of a maximal $M$-sequence inside $I$ is fixed by the number $$\mbox{depth}(I,M)=\min\{n\geq0|\mbox{Ext}^n(A/I,M)\neq0\}.$$ However, if $IM=M$, then it can be shown that $\mbox{Ext}^i(A/I,M)=0 \ \forall i\geq0.$ The usual convention is that $\mbox{depth}(I,M)=\infty$ in this case, but I was wondering if the connection with the maximal length of an $M$-sequence is altogether lost. Since the ring is Noetherian, a maximal $M$-sequence still exists. So presumably there may be two different $M$-sequences with different length? Or is the maximal length of an $M$-sequence still fixed but cannot be determined by the non-vanishing dimension of $\mbox{Ext}^n(A/I,M)$ ?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

When $M$ is a vector space and $I=A$, every $M$-sequence has length 0 (Every non-zero element of $A$ acts as a unit on $M$, so the condition $(a_1,\ldots,a_n)M\neq M$ is not satisfied). So the convention $\mbox{depth}(I,A)=\infty$ has nothing to do with the length of a maximal $M$-sequence, at least in this case.

$M=0$ is another trivial example in which this occurs.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.