Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field and consider the $k$-algebra $M_{n}(k)$ (the set of all $n \times n$ matrices with entries in $k$). Let $T$ be an indecomposable $M_{n}(k)$ module, why must $T$ have length $1$ and dimension $n$ as a $k$-vector space?

share|improve this question
    
Do you know what semi-simple means? What is your background/the context? –  Plop Sep 13 '11 at 17:18
    
@Plop: yes, I know what semi-simple means, feel free to give any suggestions, this is self-study. Even if I don't understand the concepts/definitions you use I will search for them. –  user10 Sep 13 '11 at 17:39

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The "right way" to do this is to say that $A=M_n(k)$ is a semi-simple ring, which means that all the $A$-modules are semi-simple (and that is equivalent to $A$ being a semi-simple $A$-module e.g. on the left). In your case, this holds because $A$ is isomorphic (as an $A$-module) to $n$ copies of $k^n$ (obvious action of $A$ on $k^n$), and $k^n$ is easily seen to be a simple $A$-module. Moreover, any simple $A$-module is a quotient of the $A$-module $A$, so it is isomorphic to $k^n$.

$T$ is simple (because it is semi-simple and indecomposable), so it is isomorphic to $k^n$.

You can also achieve this "by hand", if you know a little linear algebra/reduction theory. Giving yourself a (finite-dimensional) $A$-module is equivalent to giving yourself a morphism of $k$-algebras $f : A \rightarrow M_m(k)$ for some $m$ (equal to the dimension of the module over $k$, of course). In $A$ you have a "full system of orthogonal idempotents", the $E_{i,i}$: they satisfy $E_{i,i}^2=E_{i,i}$, $E_{i,i}E_{j,j}=0$ if $i \neq j$, and $\sum_i E_{i,i} = 1$. If we let $e_i = f(E_{i,i})$, the $e_i$ satisfy these relations also. Linear alg/reduction tells you that after conjugation by an invertible $m \times m$ matrix, the $e_i$ are diagonal matrices with zeros and ones on the diagonal, the places where the ones are are "disjoint" and cover the whole diagonal. Next $f(E_{i,j}) = f(E_{i,i}E_{i,j}E_{j,j})=e_if(E_{i,j})e_j$, so the $f(E_{i,j})$ have a special form, and working out their relations you get that after conjugation by an invertible matrix, $f$ maps a matrix $M$ to a block-diagonal matrix having $m/n$ (necessarily an integer) copies of $M$ on the diagonal. That is a concrete way of saying that any $A$-module of finite dimension over $k$ is a direct sum of copies of $k^n$.

share|improve this answer
    
I don't understand why $T$ is isomorphic to $k^n$ I thought that $A$ is isomorphic to $k^{n^{2}}$. Can you please explain this part? –  user10 Sep 22 '11 at 3:19
    
Let $V_i \subset A$ be the sub vector space of matrices that are $0$ except maybe on the $i$th column. Then $V_i$ is a sub-$A$-module of the left $A$-module $A$, and $A = \oplus_{i=1}^{n} V_i$. –  Plop Sep 22 '11 at 17:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.