Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $R\subseteq S$ be an integral extension of commutative rings with identity. Let $P$ be a prime ideal in $R$ and $Q$ a prime ideal in $S$. If $Q=PS$ and $P=Q\cap R$ what can we say about $Q^n\cap R$? This ideal always contains $P^n$, but when does equality hold?

share|improve this question
What have you tried? Do you know an example where equality does not hold? –  Georges Elencwajg Sep 12 '11 at 8:08

1 Answer 1

For example if $R\subseteq S$ is flat: the extension then actually is faithfully flat and thus for every ideal $I\subseteq R$ we have $IS\cap R=I$. Applying this to $I=P^n$ yields $$P^n = SP^n\cap R = (SP)^n \cap R = Q^n \cap R.$$

However flatness is not a frequent property of integral extensions ...

share|improve this answer
Flatness is more common then you think, due to the "miracle flatness theorem": Is $R$ is regular, $S$ is Cohen-Macaualy, and $R \subseteq S$ is finite, then $S$ is flat over $R$. –  David Speyer Sep 12 '11 at 17:29
But for $\dim (R)>2$ the condition of being Cohen-Macaulay strongly restricts the admissible singularities of $S$. Moreover even in the $1$-dimensional case one (almost) completely excludes the case of non-normal domains $R$. –  Hagen Knaf Sep 13 '11 at 7:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.