Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question is self-contained. In the book "Monomial Ideals", by Herzog and Hibi, p. 45, we have the following definition:

Definition: Let $K$ be a field. A one-parameter flat family of $K$-algebras is a family of $K$-algebras $R_a, \, a \in K$, for which there exists a $K$-algebra $R$ and a flat $K$-algebra homomorphism $K[t] \rightarrow R$ whose fibres $R/(t-a)R$ are isomorphic to $R_a$ for all $a \in K$ ($t$ is an indeterminate over $K$).

Question: i don't understand two things. First what does the quantity $R/(t-a)R$ mean, since $t$ is not in general an element of $R$. Is it the image of $t$ under the $K$-algebra morphism $K[t] \rightarrow R$? Second, why are the quantities $R/(t-a)R$ called fibres? I know that in topology fibre is the inverse image of a closed set under a continuous morphism and in commutative algebra i have seen the word fibre been used in the context of inverse images of prime ideals.

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Yes, $t \in R$ also denotes the image of $t \in K[t]$. This is somewhat confusing, especially when the homomorphism $K[t] \to R$ is something like below.

You can image $K[t] \to R$ as a morphism of (affine) schemes $\mathrm{Spec}(R) \to \mathbb{A}^1_K$. The scheme-theoretic fiber over a $K$-point $a$ corresponding to the maximal ideal $(t-a)$ is $\mathrm{Spec}(R \otimes_{K[t]} K[t]/(t-a)) = \mathrm{Spec}(R/(t-a))$. This explains the terminology. It is well-known that the underlying topological space of the scheme-theoretic fiber is the usual topological fiber.

In this language, the definition becomes really geometric (as already indicated by the terminology): A flat family is given (affine) schemes $X_a$ parametrized by the $K$-points $a$ of $\mathbb{A}^1_K$, such that there is a flat (affine) scheme $X$ and a morphism $X \to \mathbb{A}^1_K$ whose fiber at $a$ identifies with $X_a$.

You can also understand this without the language of schemes. If $R = K[t]$, then $K[t] \to R$ corresponds to a polynomial $p \in R[t]$ (the image of $t$) (which you may imagine as the morphism $p : \mathbb{A}^1_K \to \mathbb{A}^1_K$), and the fiber of $R$ at $t-a$ is $R/(p-a) = K[t]/(p-a)$. If $K$ is algebraically closed, $p$ is monic, and not constant $a$, we may write $p-a = (t-\lambda_1)^{k_1} \cdot \dotsc \cdot (t-\lambda_n)^{k_n}$, where $\{\lambda_1,\dotsc,\lambda_n\}$ equals the usual fiber $\{\lambda \in K : p(\lambda)=a\}$. The Chinese Remainder Theorem gives $R/(p-a) \cong \prod_i K[t]/(t-\lambda_i)^{k_i}$. As you can see, the fiber of $p$ at $a$ is encoded in this algebra, including multiplicities.

Specific example: Take $K=\mathbb{C}$, $p = x^3$ (i.e. we look at $\mathbb{A}^1 \to \mathbb{A}^1,~ t \mapsto t^3$) and say $a=1$. If $\zeta_3$ is a third primitive root of unity, then the fiber is $\mathbb{C}[t]/(p-a) = \mathbb{C}[t]/(t-1) \times \mathbb{C}[t]/(t-\zeta_3) \times \mathbb{C}[t]/(t-\zeta_3^2) \cong \mathbb{C}^3$, a product of three fields. However, for $a=0$, the fiber is $\mathbb{C}[t]/(t^3)$, not reduced.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.