Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am wondering if particle interactions in quantum theory can be modeled as a morphism between $2$ categories. My reasoning is that since the states of particles are modeled as vectors in a Hilbert space, given two Hilbert spaces, call them $A$ and $B$, could the interaction be described a morphism $f$ between $A$ and $B$. Suppose the category $C$ is given by $f:A\to B$ Where $A$ is the Hilbert space containing the states of the $2$ particles $\psi_1$ and $\psi_2$ and $B$ is the Hilbert space containing the states of the particles $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ after the interaction. So can particle interactions be understood in a category theoretic way, specifically the category of Hilbert Spaces.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

There is an excellent expository article on this by John Baez:

http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0404040

There is another article by Baez and Lauda on the more general topic of n-categories and their role in physics which is worth checking out:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0908.2469

Of course, for details you can check the references therein, but here are a few of note (in my opinion):

http://arxiv.org/abs/0808.1023

http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0601458

http://arxiv.org/abs/0706.0711

Also, as quantum mechanics can be viewed as a 1-dimensional quantum field theory, the categorical approach to QFT might be of interest to you. In that regard, these references might be of interest:

http://arxiv.org/abs/q-alg/9503002

http://www-math.mit.edu/~lurie/papers/cobordism.pdf

One last thing to go with the theme of (higher) categorical physics: a few months back Urs Schreiber posted this article, which claims to have solved Hilbert's sixth problem (i.e. axiomatizing physics) by using the language of cohesive $\infty$-topoi. It's a massive article that I've only read through a small portion of, but it definitely seems interesting.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks :) exactly what I'm looking for. –  user118822 Jan 5 at 1:15
    
Don't mention it. And, actually, now that I think of it a related idea that I find very interesting in this paper (the thesis of one of Baez's students): arxiv.org/abs/1106.4068. The basic idea is that classical mechanics is described mathematically using symplectic geometry, and so in the 60's a quantization procedure was developed, and in this paper the same thing is developed for the field theory analogue of symplectic geometry, multisymplectic geometry. This approach uses a lot of (n-)categorical language for describing quantum theories, so that is why I mention it. –  Ralph Mellish Jan 5 at 1:23
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.