Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In a paper I was reading on dynamics, I came across a proof of a central limit theorem in a certain situation using brownian motion and an almost sure invariance principle. I am not very experienced in probability theory; so I would like to know:

  1. Is this a standard method to prove the central limit theorem?

  2. What is possibly the advantage in such an approach?

  3. What are some references to see simple instances of such a proof of CLT, law of iterated logarithm, etc?

share|improve this question
    
Could you further explain the kind of central limit theorem and the "certain situation using Brownian motion"? –  Tim van Beek Sep 8 '11 at 13:01
    
@Tim van Beek: CLT as proved in this paper: maths.warwick.ac.uk/~mpollic/k.pdf –  George Sep 8 '11 at 13:09
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Or try the reference in the paper: 3] P. Billingsley, Convergence of probability measures, John Wiley, New York-London-Sydney 1968

It is actually a beautiful (but challenging) book

share|improve this answer
add comment

The central limit theorem is generally proved by proving that the sequences of characteristic functions converge pointwise to a characteristic function of a normal random variable. This method is because the Lévy's Continuity Theorem that states:

A sequence $\{ X_j \}$ of $n$-variate random variables converges in distribution to random variable $X$ if and only if the sequence $\{ \varphi_{X_j} \}$ converges pointwise to a function $\varphi$ which is continuous at the origin. Then $\varphi$ is the characteristic function of $X$.

And the fact that a random variable is uniquely determined by its characteristic function.

The trick to proof the sequence converges is consider the expansion of Taylor of order $2$ of the characteristic functions and is pretty straightforward to see that converges to a characteristic function of a normal r.v.

The advantage is that the proof requires you only basic knowledge of calculus, if you consider true the uniqueness of the characteristic function and the theorem of Lévy.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.