Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $G$ be a group of order $2014=2\times 19\times 53$. The Sylow Theorems give that the Sylow-19 and 53 subgroups are unique and normal. Let these be $H$ and $K$, respectively. Then since $H$ and $K$ intersect trivially, $HK$=$H \times K$=$C_{19} \times C_{53} \cong C_{1007}$ is a (normal) subgroup of $G$. But this means that $G$ is either the direct product with $C_2$, giving $C_{2014}$, or the semidirect product over the only automorphism of order 2, giving $D_{2014}$.

I guess the 2 groups I'm missing are $C_{19} \times D_{106}$ and $C_{53} \times D_{38}$. Is that correct? In either case, what was the flaw in my argument above?

share|cite|improve this question

Note that

$$\text{Aut} (C_{1007})\cong C_{18}\times C_{52}$$

so $\;C_2\;$ can act as inversion only on the generator of $\;C_{19}\;$ , only in the generator of $\;C_{53}\;$ or on both. These three non-trivial actions give you three semidirect products...

share|cite|improve this answer
Ah, I was assuming the Automorphism group of $C_{1007}$ was cyclic. Thanks! – Nishant Dec 31 '13 at 17:33

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.