Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been fighting with this homework problem for a while now, and I can't quite see the light. The problem is as follows,

Assume random variable $X \ge 0$, but do NOT assume that $\mathbb{E}\left[\frac1{X}\right] < \infty$. Show that $$\lim_{y \to 0^+}\left(y \, \mathbb{E}\left[\frac{1}{X} ; X > y\right]\right) = 0$$

After some thinking, I've found that I can bound

$$ \mathbb{E}[1/X;X>y] = \int_y^{\infty}\frac1{x}\mathrm dP(x) \le \int_y^{\infty}\frac1{y}\mathrm dP(x) $$

since $\frac1{y} = \sup\limits_{x \in (y, \infty)} \frac1{x}$ resulting in

$$ \lim_{y \to 0^+} y \mathbb{E}[1/X; X>y] \le \lim_{y \to 0^+} y \int_y^{\infty}\frac1{y}\mathrm dP(x) = P[X>0]\le1 $$

Of course, $1 \not= 0$. I'm not really sure how to proceed...

EDIT: $\mathbb{E}[1/X;X>y]$ is defined to be $\int_y^{\infty} \frac{1}{x}\mathrm dP(x)$. This is the notation used in Durret's Probability: Theory and Examples. It is NOT a conditional expectation, but rather a specifier of what set is being integrated over.

EDIT: Changed $\lim_{y \rightarrow 0^-}$ to $\lim_{y \rightarrow 0^+}$; this was a typo.

share|improve this question
3  
It's not a good idea for titles to be entirely in $\TeX$. –  J. M. Sep 6 '11 at 3:14
    
Srivatsan, J.M.: fixed! –  duckworthd Sep 6 '11 at 3:16
    
@J.M. Interesting. Why is full title in TeX discouraged? –  Srivatsan Sep 6 '11 at 3:30
1  
To take myself as an example, @Sri, I browse questions by right-clicking on them to open in new tabs. Having the title entirely in $\TeX$ brings up the MathJax menu instead of the browser's popup menu, which interferes with this. Having a text portion allows you to have a place where right-clicking gives the browser's popup menu. –  J. M. Sep 6 '11 at 3:48
    
@Sri yup, typo. Thanks for catching! –  duckworthd Sep 6 '11 at 4:05

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Hint(s) For every positive $y$, let $Z_y=(y/X)\mathbf{1}(y/X<1)$. You want to prove that $E(Z_y)\to0$ when $y\to0^+$.

It happens that $0\le Z_y<1$ with full probability, for every positive $y$, and that $Z_y\to0$ when $y\to0^+$ with full probability. (Of course you should check this.)

Now, your goal is to find a condition on a given family of nonnegative random variables $(T_y)$ that ensures that $$\lim\limits_{y\to0^+}E(T_y)=E\left(\lim\limits_{y\to0^+}T_y\right)$$ and to check that your family $(Z_y)$ fulfills this condition. There should not exist so many conditions of this ilk in your textbook...

share|improve this answer
    
Got it! Thanks (again) @Didier! –  duckworthd Sep 6 '11 at 7:37
    
@duck, you are welcome. –  Did Sep 6 '11 at 8:52
    
@duckworthd Now that you solved the problem, could you mention what condition that is ? Thanks –  Sasha Sep 6 '11 at 15:46
    
@Sasha, either bounded or dominated convergence should work here. –  cardinal Sep 21 '11 at 23:13

Hint: For any $k > 1$, $\int_y^\infty \frac{y}{x} \ dP(x) \le \int_y^{ky}\ dP(x) + \int_{ky}^\infty \frac{1}{k} \ dP(x) \le \ldots$

share|improve this answer
    
Hm... If I could split the limit into 2 ($\lim_{y \rightarrow 0^+} \int_{y}^{ky}dP(x) + \lim_{y \rightarrow 0^+} \int_{ky}^{\infty} \frac{1}{k} dP(x)$, one for both integrals, the first would go to 0 as $(y,ky) \rightarrow \emptyset$, but the second still wouldn't necessarily go to 0. I'm afraid I don't follow... –  duckworthd Sep 6 '11 at 4:21
    
The second $\le 1/k$. –  Robert Israel Sep 6 '11 at 4:43
    
Hmmm...My guess would be that you place a $\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty}$ outside of $\lim_{y \rightarrow 0^+}$, then let the first integral go to 0 as $y \rightarrow 0$ for fixed $k$, then swap the 2 $\lim$ and let the second integral go to 0 as $k \rightarrow \infty$ for fixed $y$. That doesn't even seem legal! –  duckworthd Sep 6 '11 at 5:00
    
No, you don't swap any limits. For fixed $k$, when $y > 0$ is small enough your integral $< 2/k$. Therefore the limit must be $\le 0$. –  Robert Israel Sep 6 '11 at 6:22
    
Another way is to make the split at $\sqrt{y}$ instead of $ky$. –  Robert Israel Sep 6 '11 at 13:25

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.