Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I came across an interesting limit I could not solve:

$$ \lim_{x \to 0^{+}}\left[\arcsin\left(x\right)\right]^{\tan\left(x\right)} $$

Given we have not proven l'Hôpital's rule yet, I have to solve it without it. Also, I would rather not use advanced methods such as the taylor series (which yield $x^x$ here).

Squeeze theorem does not (easily?) really help here, nor does the exponent function as far as I see it:

$$ \lim_{x\rightarrow 0+}(\arcsin x)^{\tan\,x} = \lim_{x\rightarrow 0+} e^{{\tan(x)}\ln(\arcsin x)} $$ Here again the exponent is an undefined term $(0 \cdot +\infty)$. Unlike all limits I practiced on however, this logarithm does not tend to $1$, so I don't really see how it cancels out.

Is there an easy solution I am missing?

share|cite|improve this question
When $x$ is close to $0$, both $\arcsin x$ and $\tan x$ are 'equal' to $x$, so you get $x^x$. (This is essentially the first order Taylor approximation.) – Ragnar Dec 29 '13 at 21:05
The limit should be $1$. – Mhenni Benghorbal Dec 29 '13 at 21:07
@Ragnar fair enough to be an intuition, I think am expected to give a more elaborate proof however. – Mikulas Dite Dec 29 '13 at 21:42
$\large\arcsin\left(x\right)$ and $\large\tan\left(x\right)$ $\large\sim x$ when $\large x \sim 0$. – Felix Marin Dec 29 '13 at 21:47
up vote 3 down vote accepted

$$\lim \limits_{x\to0^{+}}(\arcsin(x))^{\tan(x)}=\lim \limits_{x\to0^{+}}e^{\large{\tan(x)\ln(\arcsin(x))}}$$ therefore, $\tan(x)\ln(\arcsin(x))=\tan(x)\ln\left[x(1+\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x}-1)\right]=$ $$\tan(x)\ln(x)+\tan(x)\frac{\ln(1+\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x}-1)}{\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x}-1} \left (\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x} -1\right)$$ the second addend goes to zero as $x \rightarrow 0^{+}$, because $(\frac{\arcsin(x)}{x}-1)$ and $\tan(x)$ $\rightarrow 0^{+}$ as $x \rightarrow 0^{+}$ while the central factor tends to 1. The first addend is equal to $x\ln(x)\frac{\tan(x)}{x}$ which tends to zero. The whole exponent tends to zero, therefore $$\lim \limits_{x\to0^{+}}e^{\large{\tan(x)\ln(\arcsin(x))}}=e^0=1$$

share|cite|improve this answer
Oh this is so awesome. Thank you. Love it! – Mikulas Dite Dec 29 '13 at 22:24
you're welcome! – twin prime Dec 29 '13 at 22:26

$$\begin{align} \lim \limits_{x\to0^{+}}(\arcsin(x))^{\tan(x)}&=\lim \limits_{x\to0^{+}}e^{\large{\tan(x)\ln(\arcsin(x))}}\\ =e^{\lim_{x\to0^{+}}\frac{\tan(x)}{x}(\arcsin(x)\ln(\arcsin(x)))\frac{x}{\arcsin(x)} }=1\end{align}$$

Notice that $\lim_{x\to0^{+}}\arcsin(x)\ln(\arcsin(x))=-\lim_{x\to0^{+}}\frac{\ln(\frac{1}{\arcsin(x)})}{{\frac{1}{\arcsin(x)}}}=-\lim_{u\to\infty}\frac{\ln(u)}{u}$

We demonstrate this limit by noticing: $0\le\frac{\ln(u)}{u}=\frac{1}{u}\int_{1}^{u}\frac{1}{t}dt\le\frac{1}{u}\int_{1}^{u}\frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}dt=\frac{2(\sqrt{u}-1)}{u}=2(\frac{1}{\sqrt{u}}-\frac{1}{u})$

for $u$ sufficiently large. So the limit is $0$.


Also $\lim_{x\to0^{+}}\frac{\tan(x)}{x}=\lim_{x\to0^{+}}\frac{\sin(x)}{x}\frac{1}{\cos(x)}=1$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Why would the log cancel out? As far as I remember $\lim\limits_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{\log(x+1)}{x} = 1$, but this does not seem to be the case. – Mikulas Dite Dec 29 '13 at 21:08
Sorry I was in the middle of making corrections. – user71352 Dec 29 '13 at 21:11
Bear with me for a second here please: $(1 + \arcsin(x) - 1) \rightarrow 0 \ne 1$, so why did the log cancel out? Are you using the limit I wrote in the comment above? Because $\lim_{x\to 0} \, \frac{\log \left(\arcsin(x)\right)}{\arcsin(x)}=-\infty$ – Mikulas Dite Dec 29 '13 at 21:22
I am using the limit that you wrote in your comment where $x$ will be denoted by $\arcsin(x)-1$. – user71352 Dec 29 '13 at 21:26
However, if $s = \arcsin(x)-1 \wedge x\rightarrow 0 \Rightarrow s \rightarrow -1$, because $\arcsin(0)=0$, right? Meaning the whole argument of the log tends to $0$, not $1$, thus the partial limit in the topmost comment above does not seem applicable. – Mikulas Dite Dec 29 '13 at 21:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.