Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On page 311 of Dale Husemöller's book Fibre Bundles in Theorem 11.6 he has the following commutative diagram $$\begin{array} & & K(BG)\\ &\nearrow &\downarrow\\ R(G)&\longrightarrow & H^*(BG,\mathbb Q) \end{array} $$ Here $G$ is a compact connected Lie group, $BG$ is its classifying space, and $R(G)$ the representation ring. The map from $R(G) \rightarrow K(BG)$ is the map which takes a representation $\rho: G \rightarrow GL_n(\mathbb C)$ to the associated vector bundle $EG\times_{\rho}\mathbb C^n$. The map from $K(BG)\rightarrow H^*(BG,\mathbb Q)$ is the usual Chern character and the map $R(G)\rightarrow H^*(BG,\mathbb Q)$ is a map he calls $ch^*$ which he says has the following property: given a $T$-module ($T\subset G$ the maximal torus) $M$ then $$ch^*M=e^{-\tau (M)}$$ where $\tau: H^1(T,\mathbb Z)\rightarrow H^2(BG, \mathbb Z)$ is the transgression map.

My question is: why the minus sign in the definition of $ch^*$?


Edit: (TB) here's a screen shot of the relevant page from Google Books

Husemöller, page 311

share|cite|improve this question
    
Thank you for adding the screen shot. – clh Sep 5 '11 at 17:30

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.