Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like to prove that the equation $ 3^x+4^x=5^x $ has only one real solution ($x=2$)

I tried to study the function $ f(x)=5^x-4^x-3^x $ (in order to use the intermediate value theorem) but I am not able to find the sign of $ f'(x)= \ln(5)\times5^x-\ln(4)\times4^x-\ln(3)\times3^x $ and I can't see any other method to solve this exercise...

share|cite|improve this question
A solution $x > 2$ is not possible by Fermat's Last Theorem. – user9413 Sep 4 '11 at 13:28
@Chandrasekhar : A rational solution $x > 2$ is not possible by FTL, but it says nothing about irrational solutions. – Gunnar Þór Magnússon Sep 4 '11 at 13:29
Maybe it would be easier to write the equation as $\left(\frac 35\right)^x +\left(\frac 45\right)^x=1$. – Davide Giraudo Sep 4 '11 at 13:51
Write $x = 2n + r$ for $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ and $r\in[0,2).$ Then if $x>2,$ $$5^x = (4^2 + 3^2)^n 5^r = 4^{2n}5^r + 3^{2n}5^r + 5^r\displaystyle\sum_{i = 1}^{n-1} \binom {n} {i} 4^{2i}3^{2(n-1)} > 4^{2n + r} + 3^{2n+ r} = 4^x + 3^x.$$ – jspecter Sep 4 '11 at 13:56
And if $x \in \mathbb{Q}_{<0}$ the lhs lies in $\mathbb{Z}_{(5)}$ whereas the rhs does not. – jspecter Sep 4 '11 at 14:03

2 Answers 2

up vote 26 down vote accepted

One direct method is to divide directly by $5^x$ and get $1=(3/5)^x+(4/5)^x$. From here it is clear that the RHS is strictly decreasing, and there is a unique solution. Almost all exponential equations can be treated this way, by transforming them to

  • one increasing function equal to one decreasing function

  • one increasing/decreasing function equal to a constant.

share|cite|improve this answer

If we insert the known solution we can write $$ 5^{2+x} = 4^{2+x} + 3^{2+x} $$ asking, whether there might another solution exist besides $x=0 $ . Then we can rewrite, putting the $5^x$ to the rhs:
$$ 5^2 = 4^2\cdot 0.8^x + 3^2\cdot 0.6^x $$ Then if the exponents $x$ on the rhs are zero, we have the known solution. But if $x$ increases over zero, then the values of both summands decrease simultaneously, thus the equality can no more hold.
The analogue occurs for decreasing $x$: both summands increase over their squares simultaneously, so there is no other solution possible. QED.

share|cite|improve this answer
Best possible answer i think. – mick Sep 29 '12 at 19:18

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.