Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I was working with this problem in an exam:

Given $\lambda\in(-1,1)\subset\Bbb R$, find $$f (\lambda)=\int_{0}^{\pi}\ln\left(1+\lambda \cos x\right)\mathrm{d}x $$

My try: put $\delta\in (0,1)$ such that $\lambda\in(-\delta,\delta)$. Using the power series of $\ln(1+x)$ and uniform convergence to take $\sum_{n=0}^\infty$ outside $\int_{0}^{\pi}$, finally, I got this:

$$f(\lambda)=-\sum_{k=1}^\infty{(2k-1)!!\over (2k)!!}{\lambda^{2k-1}\over 2k}$$

But I still wonder if there is a closed form for $f(\lambda)?$ And is my solution above right or wrong?

share|cite|improve this question
Regarding my edit: You have given an "explicit" formula because it is not, for example, written as a recursion, or given by a functional equation. In fact, I would say that even the original integral is an explicit formula. The technical word for what you are looking for is "closed form". – Eric Stucky Dec 24 '13 at 6:20
@EricStucky Thank you!I learned from this – C Weid Dec 24 '13 at 6:22
(Please, if you don't have some technical restriction that prevents you from doing so, put a space after punctuation symbols. It's very disorienting to see two sentences smashed together like that.) – Eric Stucky Dec 24 '13 at 6:24
The antiderivative of your integrand has a closed form (not very nice at all !); its value at x=0 can be computed but, at x=Pi, the value is indeterminate and I have not been able to find its limit. – Claude Leibovici Dec 24 '13 at 6:45
@CWeid After you ask a question here, if you get an acceptable answer, you should "accept" the answer by clicking the check mark ✓ next to it. This scores points for you and for the person who answered your question. You can find out more about accepting answers here: How do I accept an answer?, Why should we accept answers?. – user40314 Jan 8 '14 at 21:42
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Here is the outline of a solution using complex analysis.

For $a > 1$, the integral $J_a = \int_0^{\pi} \ln(1 + 2a\cos t + a^2) \, dt$ has the value $2\pi \ln a$, and this integral essentially reduces to yours for an appropriate choice of $a$, but with an extra constant term.

To calculate the value of $J_a$, you can show that it is really $\int_\gamma \ln(a + z)/iz \, dz$ where $\gamma$ is the unit circle, described counterclockwise. To do this, break the integral into the top and bottom semicircle, parametrizing both from $0$ to $\pi$, going from right to left on each semicircle. Then subtract the bottom integral from the top one to obtain $J_a$.

By the residue theorem, the integral is $2\pi i$ times the residue at $0$, which is $(\ln a)/i$.

An alternative way to compute $J_a$ is to calculate the exact value, using trigonometry, of a Riemann sum with $n$ equally spaced points. This turns out to be: $$2\pi \ln a + \frac{\pi}{n} \ln \left[ \frac{1 + a}{1 - a}(a^{-2n} - 1) \right]$$ which tends to $2 \pi \ln a$. This last calculation is carried out in full in Cours de mathématiques spéciales (1991) by Ramis, Volume 3, p. 207.

Here is an idea for a third solution, though I haven't carried out the details. Integrating under the integral sign gives $$f'(\lambda) = \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\cos x}{1 + \lambda \cos x} \, dx.$$ Now compute the integral on the right (easier said than done), integrate the resulting function of $\lambda$, and use $f(0) = 0$ to find $f(\lambda)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I like your answer, with its various solution methods clearly outlined. I took on the task of carrying out the third idea :) See my answer below. – Bennett Gardiner Dec 31 '13 at 10:11

The answer to your integral is $$ f(\lambda) = \pi \ln\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{1-\lambda^2}}{2}\right) $$ Now to derivation. Given that $$ \int_0^\pi \cos^n(x) \mathrm{d}x = \frac{1+(-1)^n}{2} \frac{\pi}{2^n} \binom{n}{n/2} $$ Doing the series expansion of the integrand in $\lambda$ and interchanging the order of summation and integration yields: $$ f(\lambda) = -\pi \sum_{m=1}^\infty \left(\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)^{2m} \frac{1}{2 m} \binom{2m}{m} = - \pi \int_0^{\lambda} \sum_{m=1}^\infty \frac{x^{2m-1}}{2^m} \binom{2m}{m} \mathrm{d}x $$ The sum equals $$ \sum_{m=1}^\infty \frac{x^{2m-1}}{2^m} \binom{2m}{m} = \frac{1}{x} \left(\sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{x^{2m}}{2^m} \binom{2m}{m} -1 \right) = \frac{1}{x} \left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-2x^2}} -1 \right) $$ Integrating this gives the answer.

share|cite|improve this answer
I wonder if there is not a typo in your elegant formula. I checked numerically and I got the same numbers with opposite sign. Cheers. – Claude Leibovici Dec 24 '13 at 6:59
I repeated your calculations and effectively arrived to $$ f(\lambda) = \pi \ln\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{1-\lambda^2}}{2}\right) $$ – Claude Leibovici Dec 24 '13 at 7:15
@ClaudeLeibovici The derivation is confuse. It's not clear. – Felix Marin Dec 24 '13 at 9:21
@FelixMarin. I must confess that I have been partly lost in Sasha's derivation. So what I did was to expand as an infinite Taylor series Log[1+X], then replace X by lambda Cos[x], integrate inside the summation and sum again. I so arrived to the same formula as Sasha's but with the opposite sign. I then confirmed my result numerically. – Claude Leibovici Dec 24 '13 at 9:26
@ClaudeLeibovici Mathematica yields your result as the correct one. It's easy to check the sign when $\lambda \approx 0$: The result is $-\pi\lambda^{2}/4$. $\tt @Sasha$ result yields $\pi\lambda^{2}/4$. – Felix Marin Dec 24 '13 at 9:37

Cool question, with some nice answers.

Let's look at using the method suggested at the end of user117487's post, the Feynman trick of differentiating under the integral sign, which happens to be my favourite technique for integration. Note that $$f'(\lambda) = \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\cos x}{1 + \lambda \cos x} \, \mathrm{d}x,$$ upon which adding and subtracting a certain integral becomes $$ \lambda \, f'(\lambda) = \pi - \int_0^{\pi} \frac{1}{1 + \lambda \cos x} \, \mathrm{d}x. $$ Let's evaluate the remaining integral, using the Weierstrass substitution \begin{align} t & = \tan \frac{x}{2}, \\ \cos x & = \frac{1 - t^2}{1 + t^2}, \\ \mathrm{d}x & = \frac{2 \,\mathrm{d}t}{1 + t^2}. \end{align} Then the integral is $$ \int_0^{\infty} \! \frac{2 \ \mathrm{d}t}{1+\lambda+(1-\lambda)t^2} $$ Let $$t=\sqrt{\frac{1+\lambda}{1-\lambda}}\ u,$$ then we have $$ 2\sqrt{\frac{1}{1-\lambda^2}} \int_0^{\infty} \! \frac{ \mathrm{d}u}{1+u^2} = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{1-\lambda^2}}. $$ From previously, $$ f(\lambda) = \pi \log \lambda - \pi \int \frac{\mathrm{d} \lambda}{\lambda\sqrt{1-\lambda^2}}. $$ The remaining integral is fairly standard, so we obtain $$ f(\lambda) = \pi \log \left( 1 + \sqrt{1-\lambda^2} \right) + c. $$ Using the fact that $f(0) = 0$ gives $c=-\pi\log 2$, and we arrive at the same result given by the other posters.

share|cite|improve this answer

$\newcommand{\+}{^{\dagger}}% \newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle #1 \right\rangle}% \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace #1 \right\rbrace}% \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack #1 \right\rbrack}% \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil #1 \right\rceil\,}% \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}}% \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}% \newcommand{\equalby}[1]{{#1 \atop {= \atop \vphantom{\huge A}}}}% \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,}% \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}}% \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,}% \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}}% \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}}% \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow}% \newcommand{\isdiv}{\,\left.\right\vert\,}% \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left\vert #1\right\rangle}% \newcommand{\ol}[1]{\overline{#1}}% \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left( #1 \right)}% \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}}% \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\,#2\,}\,}% \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}}% \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}}% \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}}% \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert}$ $\ds{\fermi\pars{\lambda} = \int_{0}^{\pi}\ln\pars{1 + \lambda\cos\pars{x}}\,\dd x: \ {\large ? }.\qquad\lambda, \delta \in {\mathbb R}\,, \quad\verts{\lambda} < \delta < 1.\quad}$ It's clear that $\ds{\fermi\pars{\lambda}}$ is an even function of $\ds{\lambda}$ and $\ds{\fermi\pars{0} = 0}$ such that we calculate

\begin{align} \fermi\pars{\lambda \not= 0}&= \int_{0}^{\pi}\ln\pars{1 + \verts{\lambda}\cos\pars{x}}\,\dd x =\half\int_{-\pi}^{\pi}\ln\pars{1 + \verts{\lambda}\cos\pars{x}}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&= \half\int_{\verts{z} = 1 \atop {\vphantom{\Huge A}\verts{{\rm Arg}\pars{z}} < \pi}} \ln\pars{1 + \verts{\lambda}\,{z^{2} + 1 \over 2z}}\,{\dd z \over \ic z} \\[3mm]&=-\,\half\,\ic \int_{\verts{z} = 1 \atop {\vphantom{\Huge A}\verts{{\rm Arg}\pars{z}} < \pi}} \ln\pars{\verts{\lambda}z^{2} + 2z + \verts{\lambda} \over 2z}\,{\dd z \over z} \end{align} The zeros $\ds{z_{\pm}}$ of $\ds{\verts{\lambda}z^{2} + 2z + \verts{\lambda}}$ are given by: $$ z_{\pm} \equiv {-1 \pm \root{1 - \lambda^{2}} \over \verts{\lambda}}\,,\qquad z_{-} < -1\,,\quad -1 < z_{+} < 0 $$

Then, $$ \fermi\pars{\lambda \not=0}= -\,\half\,\ic \int_{\verts{z} = 1 \atop {\vphantom{\Huge A}\verts{{\rm Arg}\pars{z}} < \pi}} \ln\pars{\bracks{z - z_{-}}\bracks{z - z_{+}}}\,{\dd z \over z} +\ \overbrace{\half\,\ic \int_{\verts{z} = 1 \atop {\vphantom{\Huge A}\verts{{\rm Arg}\pars{z}} < \pi}} \ln\pars{2z \over \verts{\lambda}}\,{\dd z \over z}} ^{\ds{\pi\ln\pars{\verts{\lambda} \over 2}}} $$

\begin{align} &\color{#c00000}{\fermi\pars{\lambda\not=0} - \pi\ln\pars{\verts{\lambda} \over 2}} \\[3mm]&=\half\,\ic\int_{-1}^{z_{+}}{\ln\pars{\verts{x - z_{-}}\verts{x - z_{+}}} + \ic\pi \over x + \ic 0^{+}}\,\dd x + \half\,\ic\int_{z_{+}}^{-1}{\ln\pars{\verts{x - z_{-}}\verts{x - z_{+}}} - \ic\pi \over x - \ic 0^{+}}\,\dd x \\[3mm]&=\half\,\ic\int_{-1}^{z_{+}}2\pi\ic\,{\dd x \over x} =-\pi\ln\pars{\verts{z_{+}}} =-\pi\ln\pars{1 - \root{1 - \lambda^{2}} \over \verts{\lambda}} =\color{#c00000}{-\pi\ln\pars{\verts{\lambda} \over 1 + \root{1 - \lambda^{2}}}} \end{align}

$$\color{#00f}{\large% \fermi\pars{\lambda} = \int_{0}^{\pi}\ln\pars{1 + \lambda\cos\pars{x}}\,\dd x =-\pi\ln\pars{2 \over 1 + \root{1 - \lambda^{2}}}}\,,\qquad \lambda \in \pars{-1,1} $$

share|cite|improve this answer

I have not been able to find the error but, numerically, your formula does not lead to the results provided by Sasha. Using your formula, it seems that the result of the infinite summation is
$$ f(\lambda) = \ln\left(\frac{1+\sqrt{1-\lambda^2}}{2}\right) / \lambda $$ which is not correct.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.