Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose you have an unlimited quantity of the number one, and the operators plus, minus, multiply, divide, and power. Consider the (countable) set $S$ you generate by combining these:

  • Using just one and plus, you can construct the natural numbers.

  • Using minus, you can construct the integers.

  • Using divide, you can construct the rational numbers.

  • Using power, you can construct nth roots like $2^{1/2} = \sqrt{2}$

So far, so good. However, you can now go further and construct things like $5^\sqrt{2}$ and far more bizarre things. Questions:

  • Did Galois show $S$ is a proper subset of the algebraic numbers? I know he showed arbitrary 5th-degree polynomials don't have "closed- form" solutions, but I believe his definition of "closed form" was more limited.

  • If not, let $T$ be the set of numbers Galois considers "closed form". Are there members of $S-T$ that solve high order polynomials?

  • $S$ seems like an "obvious" set to me. Does it have a name, and do people study it?

  • I chose $5^\sqrt{2}$ as a "random example": it seems obvious that it's non-algebraic, but I can't seem to prove it.

share|improve this question
9  
$5^{\sqrt 2}$ is transcendental, via Gelfond-Schneider. –  J. M. Sep 3 '11 at 16:50
2  
Solutions to the quintic do have closed forms, but in general one requires hypergeometric or theta functions to express them (much like trigonometric functions turn up in solving the cubic). –  J. M. Sep 3 '11 at 16:53
1  
Galois's work does not deal with $S$. The set $S$ contains transcendental numbers, for instance your $5^{\sqrt{2}}$. Since $S$ is countable, "most" transcendental numbers are not in $S$. I know nothing about the intersection of $S$ and the algebraic numbers. There is a limited number of results that could be thought of as being about $S$, having to do with algebraic independence. –  André Nicolas Sep 3 '11 at 17:47
8  
Galois' work is not really about these matters. –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Sep 3 '11 at 19:50
    
Isn't this closure you described the Exponential closure of the rationals? –  Asaf Karagila Sep 4 '11 at 7:37
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

It may be that your set $S$ is the set some people call "the elementary numbers." There are some papers about this: Tim Chow, What is a closed-form number?, Amer Math Monthly, 1999; aargh, my internet connection just vanished, so I can't copy out any more, but I typed "elementary number" into Google Scholar and a bunch of likely papers came up.

share|improve this answer
    
This is fantastic, thank you! –  barrycarter Sep 4 '11 at 15:04
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.