Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was wondering if there is a nice way to see that $\mathbb{RP}^{3}$ is orientable without using tools of algebraic topology, like homology.

The only think I could think of was to argue that $\mathbb{RP}^{3}=\mathbb{R}^3 \cup \mathbb{RP}^{2}$ and perhaps you could argue that to get back to any starting position you have to cross the $\mathbb{RP}^{2}$ boundary but I'm pretty sure that what I'm thinking is nonsense.

This was a question on the homework for one of my topics courses and I plan on asking the professor about it tomorrow, but I was curious to see if anyone had any interesting ways of thinking about or picturing this space.

share|improve this question
2  
Have you tried using the usual atlas and checking if the determinants of the Jacobians of the transition functions are positive? –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Oct 5 '10 at 13:01
    
Our professor said he didn't want us to think of the differential geometry style definition (which I neglected to mention in my question) and instead to argue that it suffices to check the antipodal map is orientation preserving and that we'd talk more about it next class. I've also only seen atlases and manifolds from informal and intuitive approaches and had a hard time seeing why the determinant of the Jacobian couldn't be negative. –  WWright Oct 5 '10 at 21:05
1  
You just have to compute the determinants of the Jacobians... that is not "hard to see" :) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Oct 6 '10 at 15:39
add comment

4 Answers

up vote 12 down vote accepted

The orientation on the universal cover, $S^3$, descends. It takes some checking of details, but you can do it for $\mathbb{R}P^n$ in exactly the same way for $n$ odd. Actually, much more generally if you have a covering $\pi: X\to B$, and $Aut_\pi (X)$ is cyclic and generated by some orientation preserving diffeo $f: X\to X$, then if $X$ is orientable, the orientation will descend to $B$. In this case the diffeo is the antipodal map which is orientation preserving on $S^n$ if and only if $n$ is odd.

share|improve this answer
add comment

One can also see that $\mathbb{R}P^3$ is a Lie group, and that all Lie groups are orientable.

To see that $\mathbb{R}P^3$ is a Lie group, first think of $S^3$ as the collection of unit quaternions. The subset $\{1,-1\}$ is not only a subgroup, but it is a normal subgroup of $S^3$. Hence, $S^3/\{1,-1\}$ is a Lie group. In fact, the elmement -1 acts as the antipodal map. (It turns out, that as a Lie group, $\mathbb{R}P^3$ is isomorphic to $SO(3)$, the 3x3 real matrices satisfying $AA^t = A^tA = Id$.)

Why is every (connected component of a) Lie group orientable? Well, suppose $G$ is a (connected) Lie group with identity $e$. At the identity, pick any ordered basis $e_i$ for $T_e G$ (i.e., pick an orientation on the vector space $T_e G$. To figure out what what orientation at $g\in G$ should be, notice the map $L_g:G\rightarrow G$ given by $L_g(h) = gh$ maps $e$ to $g$. Hence its differential $d_e L_g$ maps $T_e G$ to $T_g G$.

The map $L_g$ is actually a diffeomorphism (with inverse $L_{g^{-1}}$), so the map $d_e L_g$ must also be an isomorphism. Now, simply take as an ordered basis $d_e L_g e_i$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

$RP3$ can be represented as a three dimensional ball $D3$ with the antipodal points of the bounding sphere identified. One can draw a small loop on the surface of the bounding sphere and compute the direction of the normal according to the right hand rule. Now, performing the same computation for the antipodal loop, the normal will have the same direction. Thus there is a consistent choice of the normal. Notice that the same argument will fail in the case of the nonorientable $RP^2$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

$RP^{2k-1}$ is a quotient of a codimension 1 submanifold with induced orientation ($S^{2k-1}$)in $R^{2k}$, by an orientation-preserving transformation of $R^{2k}$. Because there is a consistent notion of normal vector (i.e., of "inside" and "outside") on the submanifold, preserving orientation of the surrounding manifold also preserves orientation on the submanifold. Transporting the orientation along a path between two points of the submanifold that are identified in the quotient can be viewed as transporting the orientation in the surrounding manifold, and this has to be consistent (have positive determinant on the local frames) because of the orientability of the surrounding manifold.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.