Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Today I felt like computing the integral cohomology of the unit circle bundle of the tangent bundle of $S^2$. For completeness, it is defined by $SS^2=\{x\in TS\colon ||x||=1\}$, where we use the standard Riemannian metric on $S^2$. The cohomology of circle bundles, or more generally sphere bundles, can be computed by the Gysin sequence http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gysin_sequence. By using that the euler class of $S^2$ is 2 times the generator of $H^2(S^2)$, I think I succeeded in this computation (if someone wants to check it, I'd be more than happy the give the details), and I find that

$H^0(SS^2)=\mathbb{Z}$

$H^1(SS^2)=0$

$H^2(SS^2)=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$

$H^3(SS^2)=\mathbb{Z}$.

This equals the cohomology of real projective space $\mathbb{R}P^3$ (see http://topospaces.subwiki.org/wiki/Cohomology_of_real_projective_space). I was wondering if these spaces are actually homeomorphic, and if there is a nice explicit way of describing the homeomorphism.

Edit: Jason DeVito pointed out a mistake in my formulation.

Edit 2: As asked, here is the calculation of the cohomology groups. The Gysin sequence is for the sphere:

$\rightarrow H^n(S^2)\rightarrow H^n(SS^2)\rightarrow H^{n-1}(S^2)\rightarrow H^{n+1}(S^2)\rightarrow$

The middle map is taking the cup product with the euler class, which is just mapping a generator of $H^{n-1}$ to the twice the generator of $H^{n+1}$. Of course this is only nonzero if $n=1$.

The exact sequence breaks down for $n=0$ to

$0\rightarrow H^0(S^2)\rightarrow H^0(SS^2)\rightarrow 0$

Which gives the isomorphism $H^0(SS^2)=\mathbb{Z}$ of course. For n=1 we get a sequence

$0\rightarrow H^1(SS^2)\rightarrow\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow^2\mathbb{Z}$.

Because the kernel of the map "cupping with the Euler class" has as kernel $0$, and the map before that is injective, we find $H^1(SS^2)=0$. We also have, just after this point in the sequence

$0\rightarrow \mathbb{Z}\rightarrow^2\mathbb{Z}\rightarrow H^2(SS^2)\rightarrow 0$.

Thus we find that $H^2(SS^2)=\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$. At $n=3$ we find

$0\rightarrow H^3(SS^2)\rightarrow H^2(S^2)\rightarrow 0$

Which gives the remaining non zero cohomology group. All the other groups vanish because the $H^q(SS^2)$ are sandwiched between higher homology groups of the two sphere, which are all zero.

share|improve this question
    
Minor point: If you're computing the de Rham cohomology, the coefficients are in $\mathbb{R}$, so you should be getting an $\mathbb{R}$ in dimension $0$ and $3$ and trivial groups elsewhere. What you've actually computed is cohomology with coefficients in $\mathbb{Z}$. –  Jason DeVito Aug 29 '11 at 14:45
    
@Jason, thank you. –  Thomas Rot Aug 29 '11 at 14:55
    
Since you kindly volunteer to do so, could you please show (as an appendix to your question) the calculation of cohomology you made: it is always nice to have such examples written down explicitly for reference. –  Georges Elencwajg Aug 29 '11 at 15:22
    
@Georges : of course –  Thomas Rot Aug 29 '11 at 15:40
    
Thank you very much, Thomas:+1. –  Georges Elencwajg Aug 29 '11 at 18:40

3 Answers 3

up vote 6 down vote accepted

$SO_3$ is the space of triples $(v_1,v_2,v_3)$ of elements of $\mathbb R^3$ which are an oriented orthonormal basis.

Given an element $x\in SS^2$, you construct a pair of orthonormal basis for it. $v_1$ is the point of $S^2$ your vector $x$ is tangent to, $x \in T_{v_1}S^2$ and $v_2$ would be the vector in $\mathbb R^3$ that is the image of $x \in T_{v_1}S^2$ under the inclusion of vector-spaces $T_{v_1}S^2 \subset \mathbb R^3$.

But given $v_1$ and $v_2$ orthonormal, $v_3 = v_1 \times v_2$.

So that's essentially why $SO_3$ and $SS^2$ are diffeomorphic / homeomorphic.

There's a lot of fun ways to see $\mathbb RP^3$ and $SO_3$ are diffeomorphic. There are arguments using the quaternions. I prefer the exponential map $T_ISO_3 \to SO_3$ -- consider it restricted to balls of various radius and stop at the first radius where the function is onto.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for your answer. I am sorry, but I am having some trouble parsing your second sentence. Do you mean to say that $v_1=\pi(x)$ where $\pi$ is the projection $SS^2\rightarrow S^2$? And $v_2$ is the element $x$ is representing in $T_\pi(x) S^2$ (which we can see as a subset of $\mathbb{R^3}$). Then take the cross product to obtain the third basis vector? –  Thomas Rot Aug 29 '11 at 15:05
    
Dear Ryan, this is a correct nice answer but I find your notations confusing. You cannot write $v \in T_xS^2$ because $x$ is not a point on the sphere, but on the circle bundle.I suppose $x,v,v_2$ all denote the same vector in the tangent plane at $v_1$? –  Georges Elencwajg Aug 29 '11 at 15:07
    
Er, yes, my morning TeX typesetting can be a little sloppy. I believe I reversed a $v_1$ and $x$ in the earlier write-up. This is hopefully more comprehensible. –  Ryan Budney Aug 29 '11 at 15:42
    
Dear Ryan, Thank you for your answer. It is clear to me now. –  Thomas Rot Aug 31 '11 at 16:24

Here's another approach. I think of it as less elementary but it fits into a fairly broad framework of general-nonsense about bundles.

Fact: The Hopf fibration $S^1 \to S^3 \to S^2$ is the circle bundle over $S^2$ with Euler class $+1$. One way to take this is this bundle is classified by a map $S^2 \to B(SO_2)$, where the induced map $H_2(S^2) \to H_2(B(SO_2))$ sends the generator to the generator. Another way to say this is you can decompose $S^3$ into two solid tori $S^1 \times D^2$, and the gluing map sends the $\{1\} \times S^1$ curve in $\partial (S^1 \times D^2)$ to the diagonal $\{(x,x) : x \in S^1\}$ curve in the boundary of the other $S^1 \times D^2$ i.e. the curve of "slope $1$".

$S^3$ is the group of unit quaternions, so the unit complex numbers $S^1$ is a subgroup. Let $\mathbb Z_n \subset S^1$ be the $n$-th roots of unity. Since $S^3/S^1 \simeq S^2$ by the Hopf fibration, there are also bundles, induced by the Hopf fibration:

$$S^1 / \mathbb Z_n \to S^3 / \mathbb Z_n \to S^2 $$

But $S^1 / \mathbb Z_n$ is a circle. So general bundle nonsense says $S^3 / \mathbb Z_n$ is the circle bundle over $S^2$ with Euler class $n$. In the case $n=2$ this is $\mathbb RP^3$, in general this space is called the Lens space $L_{n,1}$. In particular, the unit tangent bundle of $S^2$ is known (by Poincare-Hopf, for example) to be the circle bundle over $S^2$ with Euler class $2$.

share|improve this answer

Here's is the outline of the argument using quaternions which Ryan alluded to in his answer.

The quaternions are, as a vector space, isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^4$. They are the set of all things of the form $q=a + bi + cj + dk$ with $a,b,c$, and $d$ real numbers together with the multiplication rules that $i^2 = j^2 = k^2 = ijk = -1$ and $ij = -ji =k$, $jk = -kj = i$, and $ki = -ik = j$. One can check that this notion of multiplication is associative with unit $1 + 0i + 0j + 0k = 1$ and every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse. If one defines the norm squared $|q|^2$ of a quaternion as $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2$, then a computation shows that for any two quaterions $q_1$ and $q_2$, we have $|q_1q_2| = |q_1||q_2|$. It follows that the unit sphere in $\mathbb{R}^4$ has the structure of a (noncommutative) Lie group.

Let $V$ be the subset of all quaternions consisting of those with $a=0$,the imaginary quaternions. Then $V$ is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^3$ as a vector space.

For each $q\in S^3$ (i.e, $q$ is a unit length quaternion), define the map $A_q:V\rightarrow V$ which sends $v$ to $qv\overline{q}$ (where $\overline{q}$ negates the $i,j,$ and $k$ terms, but leaves the real part alone). Because $|qv\overline{q}| = |q||v||q| = |v|$, $A_q\in SO(3)$.

That means that $q\rightarrow A_q$ is really a homomorphism from $S^3\rightarrow SO(3)$. Now one shows the following: Every element of $SO(3)$ is in the image of $S^3$ under this map and $1$ and $-1\in S^3$ together make up the whole kernel of the map. It follows that $SO(3)$ is diffeomorphic to $S^3/$~ where $q$~$-1*q$. But this is precisely the identification done on $S^3$ to get $\mathbb{R}P^3$ so we must have that $SO(3)$ and $\mathbb{R}P^3$ are diffeomorphic.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for your answer. It is very lucidly written. –  Thomas Rot Aug 31 '11 at 16:25

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.