# Why is this unbounded linear functional also has a closed kernel?

On the space $l_0$ of sequences with finite non-zeros, define $f:l_0\to l_0$ to be: $$f(x)_k=kx_k,$$ then $f$ is famously unbounded. According to my textbook, that means $f$ must have a non-closed kernel. But in this particular case, isn't it that the kernel of $f$ is $\{0\}$, which is clearly closed?

-
The kernel is necessarily non-closed only for a linear functional. A discontinuous linear operator can have a closed kernel. –  Prahlad Vaidyanathan Dec 11 '13 at 17:50
A little bit more general: the implication "kernel closed $\Rightarrow$ continuity" holds true only if the target space is finite dimensional (see, e.g. math.stackexchange.com/questions/135791/…). –  Romeo Dec 11 '13 at 17:52
@Romeo: Yeah, your right, I forgot it has to be finite dimensional. Thanks. –  Voldemort Dec 11 '13 at 17:55
You are welcome. –  Romeo Dec 11 '13 at 18:01
It should be "you're", sorry. –  Voldemort Dec 11 '13 at 18:04