Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The Steinhaus theorem says that if a set $A \subset \mathbb R^n$ is of positive inner Lebesgue measure then $\operatorname{int}{(A+A)} \neq \emptyset$. Is it true that also $\operatorname{int}{(tA+(1-t)A)} \neq \emptyset$ for $t \in(0,1)$? It is clear for $t=\frac{1}{2}$? But in general? Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
I'm not sure what your definition of "positive inner Lebesgue measure" is. However, it should imply that $A$ contains a set $B$ of finite positive measure. Then apply Cor. 20.17 of Hewitt-Ross you mention in the other answer to $tB$ and $(1-t)B$ and note that $tB + (1-t)B$ contains an open set, hence so does $tA + (1-t)A \supset tB + (1-t)B$. – t.b. Aug 25 '11 at 23:55
Sorry, maybe I have not right, in that way by the Steinhaus theorem $t(B+B)+(1-t)(B+B)$ contain an open set. But is it suffices in order to $tB+(1-t)B$ contains an open set? – Richard Aug 26 '11 at 8:37
In the corollary linked to you have the result saying: If $X$ and $Y$ have positive measure then $X + Y$ contains an open set. Take $X = tB$ and $Y= (1-t)B$. – t.b. Aug 26 '11 at 8:42
Sorry, you have right. – Richard Aug 26 '11 at 9:00
up vote 18 down vote accepted


If $A$ has positive inner measure then it contains a measurable set $B$ of positive finite measure.

Now for $0 \lt t \lt 1$ both $tB$ and $(1-t)B$ have positive measure, hence $tB + (1-t)B$ contains an open set by the result mentioned below. Therefore the interior of $tA + (1-t)A \supset tB + (1-t)B$ is non-empty.

In Corollary 20.17 on page 296 of Hewitt–Ross, Abstract Harmonic Analysis, I the following general result is shown:

Let $X$ and $Y$ be measurable sets of (finite) positive measure in a locally compact group with left Haar measure $\mu$. Then $XY$ contains an open set.

The proof relies on showing that the convolution $[X]\ast[Y](z)$ of the characteristic functions $[X]$ and $[Y]$ is equal to the function $z \mapsto \mu(X \cap zY^{-1})$; it is continuous; it vanishes outside $XY$; and it is non-zero because $\int [X]\ast[Y]=\mu(X) \mu(Y) \gt 0$, hence $XY$ must contain an interior point.

Some background, applications and further links are contained in this thread here.

If you read French you may want to have a look at Hugo Steinhaus's original article Sur les distances des points des ensembles de mesure positive, Fund. Math. 1 (1920), 93–104.

In fact, the entire first issue of Fundamenta Mathematicae is packed with gems of this sort. Fourteen (!) articles are by Wacław Sierpiński.

share|cite|improve this answer
Nice one the Steinhaus's paper. – leo Jan 23 '12 at 5:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.