Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the subgroup of $GL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$ that is generated by $ $$SL_{2}(\mathbb{F}_{p})$ and $H_{2}$ where $$ H_{2}=\left\{ \left(\begin{array}{cc} a & b\\ 0 & c\end{array}\right):a,c\in\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\times},b\in\mathbb{F}_{p}\right\} $$

share|cite|improve this question
Remember that the determinant is linear in each of the rows. If you start with a matrix in $GL_2$, can you modify it slightly to get something with determinant $1$? – Dylan Moreland Aug 25 '11 at 7:43

Your $H_2$ is traditionally denoted by $B$ and is called a Borel subgroup (sometimes the standard Borel subgroup) of $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$

Exercise: $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$ is a disjoint union $B\sqcup BwB$, where $w=\begin{pmatrix}0&1\\1&0\end{pmatrix}$, and $BwB=\{b_1wb_2|b_1,b_2\in B\}$.

This fact is fairly important in the representation theory of $GL_2(\mathbb{F}_p)$, and among other things it should immediately answer your question.

share|cite|improve this answer




$|SL(2,\mathbb{F_p})\cap H_2|=(p-1)p$, since it consists of elements of $H_2$ with $c=a^{-1}$

Then $| \langle SL(2,\mathbb{F_p}),H_2\rangle| \geq|SL(2,\mathbb{F_p}) H_2|$

$= |SL(2,\mathbb{F_p})|\cdot|H_2|/|SL(2,\mathbb{F_p})\cap H_2| = (p^2-1)(p^2-p)=|GL(2,\mathbb{F_p})|$

So the subroup is in fact whole group.

share|cite|improve this answer
The answer suggested by Alex B. is more useful(general): one can ask same question with $F_p$ replaced by any field (infinite field also); then the answer of Alex B. is valid; whereas my answer and that of Robinson necessarily uses finiteness of groups. – David Aug 25 '11 at 9:06
True, but the Frattini argument adapts to other contexts, including this one. In the algebraic group situation, the unipotent radical of the Borel can play the role of the Sylow, and the Frattini argument works with respect to any normal subgroup containing it. – Geoff Robinson Aug 25 '11 at 9:27

This is a good opportunity to make use of the Frattini argument. The Frattini argument use Sylow's Theorem to factorize a finite group $G$ in the presence of a normal subgroup $N.$ It states that if $N \lhd G$ and $P \in {\rm Syl}_{p}(N),$ then we have $G = NN_{G}(P).$ The proof is not difficult: for any $g \in G,$ we have $P^{g} \leq N$ as $N \lhd G.$ But $P^g$ is another Sylow $p$-subgroup of $N,$ so $P^{g} = P^{n}$ for some $n \in N.$ Then $gn^{-1} \in N_{G}(P),$ so that $g \in N_{G}(P)N = NN_{G}(P).$ Since $g$ was arbitrary, we have $G = NN_{G}(P).$

In your case, $P$, the group of upper unitriangulr matrices (ie upper triangular with $1$'s on the diagonal) is in ${\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{F}_p)$ and is a Sylow $p$-subgroup of that group. Its normalizer (in ${\rm GL}$) is precisely the group you call $H_2.$ Thus we have ${\rm GL}(2,\mathbb{F}_p) = {\rm SL}(2,\mathbb{F}_p)H_2$ by a Frattini argument.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.