Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Kollros' Theorem, with extended turns allowed, says

For every ring containing $p$ spheres, there exists a ring of $q$ spheres, each touching each of the $p$ spheres [...] if more than one turn is allowed, then $$(p-2r)(q-2s)=4rs\quad\quad\left[\text{ or }\frac{r}{p}+\frac{s}{q}=\frac{1}{2},\text{ -anon }\right]$$ where $r$ and $s$ are the numbers of turns on both necklaces before closing.

(The first sentence looks like it contains an error: there shouldn't be a $q$ for every $p$ - most likely it should read that two interlocking rings of spheres correspond to solutions to the Diophantine equation and vice-versa.)

Firstly, in terms of tangencies and intersections, what precisely is a turn? Secondly, can this be seen via inversive geometry in an analogous way to Soddy's hexlet ($r=s=1$, $p=3$, $q=6$)? Inversion preserves tangencies, and sends spheres intersecting the center of inversion to planes, so for Soddy's hexlet we can invert about any tangent point of the first ring of $3$ spheres so that we get two parallel planes and a sphere stuck between them, reducing the problem of finding the interlocking ring of spheres to the annular case, which is equivalent to working with a Steiner chain (or more specifically the kissing number problem), and the $p=4$, $q=4$ case can be reduced similarly.

$\hskip 0.2in$ Soddy's hexlet annular hexlet

There doesn't appear to be any reference for this, as MathWorld cites a "personal communication."

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.