Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Here is a nice graph representing the solution: wolframalpha. I wish to draw such a graph myself but don't have any idea which methods exist and which of them are more appropriate for equations of this kind.

share|improve this question
we can write it as sin(x)-sin(y)-sin(x*y)=0 and use some numerical approximation method newton's method or something like this. first trivial solution is x=y=0 –  dato datuashvili Aug 25 '11 at 6:35
@user3196, nice! But to draw a graph I need many solutions. How can I find them? By choosing different starting points? –  max taldykin Aug 25 '11 at 8:03
A very nice graph. Whose artist's hand is this? (Well, I'm joking... but not only joking...) –  Gottfried Helms Aug 25 '11 at 10:45
You'll want to look into Jeff Tupper's thesis on the matter of graphing implicit Cartesian equations; his software GrafEq is a particular implementation of his ideas. –  J. M. Aug 25 '11 at 16:52
@J. M.: thanks, it seems quite useful (but first I need to read hundred of pages to understand interval arithmetic). I wish I could accept your answer. –  max taldykin Aug 26 '11 at 6:33
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The standard numerical method for plotting an implicit function graph, say $f(x,y) = 0$, is to evaluate $f$ at points on a triangular grid, see which cells of the grid have a change of sign, and use linear interpolation to approximate the function in each cell. Thus if you have three grid points $A$, $B$, $C$ with $f(A) = 1$, $f(B) = -1$ and $f(C) = 2$, you would draw a line segment from the midpoint of $AB$ to the point $1/3$ of the way from $B$ to $C$.
More sophisticated software might sample more points in a cell once a sign change has been detected, or use quadratic interpolation.

Another approach would be to numerically solve a system of differential equations such as $\frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$, $\frac{dy}{dt} = - \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$, starting at an initial solution. This would run into trouble at points where both partial derivatives are $0$ (which typically happens at self-intersections of the curve). Also, it's hard to know a priori how many initial solutions to look for (one in each component of the curve).

share|improve this answer
thanks! can you give some references to more detailed description of these methods, or maybe their names (which I can google for)? –  max taldykin Aug 25 '11 at 8:23
@max, see math.stackexchange.com/questions/32528/… –  lhf Aug 26 '11 at 18:59
@lhf, great links! (definitely I need to understand interval arithmetic) –  max taldykin Aug 26 '11 at 20:00
add comment

Note that the plot from Wolfram Alpha isn't particularly good; you can see a lot of jagged artifacts all over the place, presumably due to insufficient initial sampling. Here's a better one from Maple, made using

plots:-implicitplot(sin(x)+sin(y)-sin(x*y), x=-5..15, y=-10..10, grid=[100,100], gridrefine=2);

Implicit plot of sin(x)+sin(y) = sin(xy)

share|improve this answer
add comment

The figure shows that there is an arc through the origin which near $(0,0)$ is well approximated by the hyperbola $x+y=x y$. For this arc (a tiny portion of the whole image!) you can recursively compute a Taylor expansion as follows: Write $$x(t):=t +\sum_{k=0}^\infty a_{2k} t^{2k}\ ,\qquad y(t):=x(-t)$$ (note that I have chosen a particular parametrization) and plug this "Ansatz" into the equation $\sin\bigl(x(t)\bigr)+\sin\bigl(y(t)\bigr)=\sin\bigl(x(t)y(t)\bigr)$. Using the Taylor expansion of $\sin$ and comparing coefficients for all even powers of $t$ the $a_{2k}$ can now be determined one for one. Doing this with Mathematica I have obtained the following first coefficients: $$x(t)=t - {t^2\over2} - {t^4\over8} + {t^6\over12} - {319 t^8\over5760} - {541 t^{10}\over26880}+\ldots\quad .$$ Now make a parametric plot of $t\mapsto\bigl(x(t),x(-t)\bigr)$ for $|t|\leq 1$, say, and you will see the arc in question.

I have told this story because it gives an "analytical" approach to such problems and is radically different from the ideas brought forward in the other comments and answers.

share|improve this answer
sorry, but I don't see how this answers my question. As I understand you are trying to represent original equation in parametric form by comparing two Taylor expansions. But wolframalpha draws something completely different for resulting equation. –  max taldykin Aug 26 '11 at 6:20
@max taldykin: I have edited my answer. Perhaps the idea has become clear now. –  Christian Blatter Aug 26 '11 at 13:36
it seems that this method is somehow similar to the second method suggested by Robert Israel. thanks for your answer, it gives some perspective from analytical viewpoint. –  max taldykin Aug 26 '11 at 20:05
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.