Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$$\lnot \forall y: Y.A\vdash \exists y: Y.(A\rightarrow B)$$

Need to prove that LHS entails RHS, however I'm confused as to how to do it. Never used a negation on a universal quantifier before.

Any help would be appreciated.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

HINT $$\lnot \forall y: Y.A \equiv \exists y: \lnot Y.A$$

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I researched on De Morgan's for Quantifiers and figured it out! –  Roberto Rodriguez Dec 7 '13 at 11:26
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.