Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Remember that (i) every maximal ideal is a prime ideal, (ii) for proper ideals $I$ of rings $R$, the factor ring $R/I$ is a field iff $I$ is a maximal ideal of $R$, and that (iii) whenever $F$ (for example $F=\mathbb{C}$) is a field, $F[x]/(p(x))$ is a field iff $p(x)$ is irreducible over $F$ (by definition, $p(x)$ is nonconstant).

Now, consider $I \subset \mathbb{C}[x, y]$ with $I=(x^2-1, y^3-1)$; computations show that (for $\alpha_1=(-1+i\sqrt{3})/2$ and $\alpha_2=(-1-i\sqrt{3})/2$)

$$I=((x+1)(x-1), (y-1)(y-\alpha_1)(y-\alpha_2)).$$

Since $\mathbb{C}$ is a field, (iii) implies (?) that $\mathbb{C}[x, y]/(p(x), q(y))$ is a field iff $p(x), q(y)$ are irreducible over $\mathbb{C}[x, y]$. It follows that the maximal ideals that contain $I$ are by (ii)

$$(x-1, y-1) \qquad (x-1, y-\alpha_1) \qquad (x-1, y-\alpha_2)$$ $$(x+1, y-1) \qquad (x+1, y-\alpha_1) \qquad (x+1, y-\alpha_2).$$

From (i) they are all prime ideals.

In the problem, we are given that there are six maximal ideals and prime ideals.

My question is: if "$\mathbb{C}[x, y]/(p(x), q(y))$ is a field iff $p(x), q(y)$ are irreducible over $\mathbb{C}[x, y]$" follows from (iii), and how can we prove that there are no more than six prime and maximal ideals that contain $I$?

I am grateful for all your help.

share|cite|improve this question
Do you know anything about Theory of Grobner Bases? – Joseph Curwen Dec 6 '13 at 9:34
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The answer to your first question is "Yes", in fact if you consider $(p(x), g(y)) \cap \mathbb{C}[x]$, this must be a prime ideal (is an easy exercise) and then $p(x)$ must be irreducible. The same argument holds with $(p(x), g(y)) \cap \mathbb{C}[y]$.

Looking at the problem of count how many maximal ideals contains $I$, I think you can follow this way:

  1. Call $M_i$ the maximal ideals you have found, then prove that $I=\cap M_i$

  2. Suppose there's another maximal ideal $N$ such that $I \subset N$, then $\cap M_i=I=N \cap I = N \cap \bigcap M_i $. You can use now the following Lemma to conclude:

Lemma Let $P$ be a prime ideal. If $I_1 , \dots , I_n$ are ideals such that $\cap I_i \subseteq P$, then there's an index $j$ such that $I_j \subseteq P $. (Try to prove it!)

If I well remember there's another way to compute such number of maximal ideals, using a bit of Algebraic Geometry and Theory of Grobner Basis.

We starts from the observation that, in an algebrically closed field, a point of a variety $V(I)$ corresponds to a maximal ideal containig $I$. Follows that, if $V(I)$ is finite, it is contained in a finite number of maximai ideals, many as its points.

Now, we link tha finiteness of $V(I)$ to the Grobner Bases by the following result.

Theorem A variety $V(I)$ han a finite number of points iff there's only a finite number of monomials not contained in the Leading Terms Ideal of $I$.

Then the following lemma (It's a vague image in my memory : I hope there's no mistakes in its assert ) can easily solve you problem:

Lemma Let $k$ me an algebricaly closed field and $I$ an ideal of the ring $k[X_1, \dots, X_n]$ such that $V(I)$ is finite. The following integers are equal:

  1. The number of points of $V(I)$.
  2. The dimension of the ring $k[X_1, \dots, X_n]/I$ as $k$- vector space.
  3. The number of monomials not contained in the ideal of the leading terms of $I$

It seems to be more complicated, but with this theorem is immediate, just calculating a Grobner Bases, to obtain a lot of information about the ideal $I$ and its variety.

In your case, for example, is very easy to check that $x^2-1$ and $y^3-1$ are a Grobner Bases of $I$ and that (for example) there's only 6 monomials not containden in the Leading Terms Ideal of I.

I'm conscious of the fatc that, if you're a student and don't know anything of this argumens, this is only an unintelligible speech, but I think is, in every case, very interesting.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.