Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am wondering if anyone knows how to evaluate either of the following sums in terms of known constants:




It is not hard to check that both converge absolutely, but based on (122)-(131) of the Wolfram Zeta Page, I think both sums should take on nice values.

References to any material which deals with these types of sums in general is also appreciated.


share|cite|improve this question
If you can calculate a few decimals, there are places to look things up. – Gerry Myerson Aug 18 '11 at 1:24
None of (122)-(131) involve $\zeta'$, so it's not clear to me why those formulas lead you to think that sums with $\zeta'$ will be "nice". – Gerry Myerson Aug 18 '11 at 3:56
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Not really an answer to the question posed, but too big to be a comment.

The value of the first sum is

$$ \sum_{k>=2} - \frac{\zeta^\prime(k)}{\zeta(k)} = 0.850312379764164578438788712404715501868902645375196564818394 $$

The above value is not recognized by Plouffe's inverter, unfortunately.

Moreover, because $\log \zeta(s) = - \sum_{k\ge1} \log (1-p_k^{-s})$ for $s>1$, it follows that $$ - \sum_{k>=2} \frac{\zeta^\prime(k)}{\zeta(k)} = \sum_{i \ge 1, k\ge 2} \frac{\log p_i}{p_i^k -1} $$ and even $\sum_{k>=1} (x^k-1)^{-1}$ is not known in closed form, so the chances are slim, but one never knows.

In regard to the other some, it comes close to

$$ \zeta_P(s) = \sum_{k \ge 1} p_k^{-s} = \sum_{n\ge 1} \frac{\mu(n)}{n} \log \zeta( s n) \qquad \text{ for } s > 1 $$

Differentiating with respect to $s$ and subtracting the pole term we would get

$$ \lim_{s \to 1+} \zeta_P^\prime(s) - \frac{1}{1-s} = C + \sum_{k \ge 2} \mu(k) \frac{\zeta^\prime(k)}{\zeta(k)} $$

which, again, is not quite the same. Numerical value for the second sum also does not turn up any results in Plouffe's inverter:

$$ \sum_{k \ge 2} \frac{\mu(k)}{k} \frac{\zeta^\prime(k)}{\zeta(k)} =0.344146097673912783894171441679617569043972324522437879896534 $$

Why do you expect these sums to have nice values ?

share|cite|improve this answer
+1, I like this answer. However the plouffe inverter is not very good at recognizing constants from number theory. For example, $B_3$ in equ (17) on this this constant does come up in a few places. – Eric Naslund Aug 18 '11 at 20:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.