Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What if we write 0. and then throw a coin and depending on the result continue the number with 1 or 0 and continue this process indefinitely. It seems like a recipe for producing irrational numbers.

Are these numbers really irrational? Are they transcendental? Are they normal? Maybe I should also ask: is anything well-defined by this recipe? :-)

share|cite|improve this question
this is related:… – Adam Nov 26 '13 at 11:11
Your "recipe" is equivalent to "a uniformly random real number in [0,1]", which obviously is irrational with probability 1. However, you can't say that it defines an irrational. It doesn't, just like the uniform random variable doesn't. – user21820 Dec 26 '13 at 9:08
up vote 1 down vote accepted

since it may happen that the coin keeps showing tail and in this case the number (base 2) is an integer, I think that a definite answer cannot be done.

UPDATE if you are interested in a probabilistic / philosophical answer (i.e., a supernatural being which performs a supertask tossing the coin at times $t$, $t+\frac{1}{2}$, $t+\frac{3}{4}$, $t+\frac{7}{8} \ldots$, at time $t+1$ she will with near certainty ($p=1$) obtain a normal number. But this is not a "recipe", in the sense she cannot be sure it is. (Ok, if she is a supernatural being maybe she has some other way to know it :-) )

share|cite|improve this answer
you mean like infinitely many times in a row? – Adam Nov 26 '13 at 10:58
yes. In you procedure, nothing disallows it. – mau Nov 26 '13 at 10:58
but isnt it rather improbable? – Adam Nov 26 '13 at 11:00
I am no probability guru, but I would venture to say that the probability is like 0, you know, in any case any non-zero probability seems absurd – Adam Nov 26 '13 at 11:03
I now can see, that your answer has some merit, but I would be stubborn and say that most of the time my recipe does define an irrational number (in practice almost always) – Adam Nov 26 '13 at 11:14

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.