Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Consider a random variable X that always takes a single value, c. I would think that a valid PDF for X would be $$f(x) = \begin{cases} 1/c & x = c \\ 0 & \text{Otherwise}\end{cases}$$

However, I know the PDF is supposed to be the derivative of the CDF, and in this case derivative of F(x) would be 0, both when $x<c$ and when $x\geq c$

What am I missing ?

share|cite|improve this question
In this case the derivative of F at x would be zero for every x different of c and would not exist at x=c. // Not every random variable has a pdf, for example Dirac ones have not. – Did Aug 15 '11 at 22:06
up vote 7 down vote accepted

What you're looking for is the Dirac delta "function"; specifically

$$f(x) = \delta(x-c).$$

I've put "function" in scare quotes above, since the Dirac delta is not actually a real function, although it can in many cases be treated as one.

Informally, you can visualize $\delta(x)$ as a function which has an infinitely tall peak at $x=0$ and is zero everywhere else; specifically, the "infinitely tall peak" needs to be just tall enough to have the area under it integrate to $1$. Of course, no actual real-valued function can have such a peak, but it turns out that, if you simply pretend that such a function exists and don't ask any hard questions about what its value at $x=0$ actually is, many calculations will just work as if nothing odd was going on.

Formally, the Dirac delta can be defined as a generalized function, specifically as a distribution. (And no, the similarity of the name with "probability distribution" is not a coincidence.)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your $f$ is not a valid PDF, since $$ \int_{ - \infty }^\infty {f(x)\,dx} = 0 \neq 1. $$

share|cite|improve this answer
Moreover, consider the case $c \leq 0$... – Shai Covo Aug 15 '11 at 22:16
But isn't the integral of f(x) = 1 at the exact point (x = c) and 0 everywhere else, integrating to 1 in total? – OctaviaQ Aug 15 '11 at 22:18
No. Since the integral of the zero function is $0$, so is the integral of $f$: changing a function on a set of measure $0$ does not affect the integral. – Shai Covo Aug 15 '11 at 22:22

A PDF (probability density function) is only for a continuous distribution - more precisely, a distribution that is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure. Your distribution is discrete, not continuous, so it does not have a PDF, it has a PMF (probability mass function). There are also singular continuous distributions (but nobody talks about them in elementary courses), and mixtures of the three types.

share|cite|improve this answer

The answer to the question in the subject line is yes.

Specifically: $$ f(x) = \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if }x=c \\ 0 & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$

The is a probability density with respect to counting measure on the real line.

share|cite|improve this answer
He/she is looking for a continuous distribution. – Unreasonable Sin Aug 15 '11 at 23:29
The answer to the question in the subject line is definitely no. – Did Aug 16 '11 at 7:27
Sorry, "Unreasonably", but that's exactly wrong. The poster was asking for a discrete distribution, since that's what a distribution would be if it's concentrated at one point. This is a density with respect to counting measure. @Didier_Piau: You're quite mistaken. – Michael Hardy Aug 19 '11 at 17:52
@Michael: Glad to know (that I am quite mistaken). Care to explain why? (Unrelated: your comment was not signaled to me, please use the @ thing in a more conventional way, that is, if you want your comments to reach their target.) – Did Aug 30 '11 at 11:32
Suuure... How clever... I guess that next time, when somebody asks if the indicator function of $\mathbb Q$ in $\mathbb R$ is continuous, your answer will be yes (for the discrete topology, haha). – Did Dec 15 '11 at 7:20

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.