Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to understand the relations and differences between integral of differential form and integral of measure. From Wikipedia:

On a general differentiable manifold (without additional structure), differential forms cannot be integrated over subsets of the manifold; this distinction is key to the distinction between differential forms, which are integrated over chains, and measures, which are integrated over subsets.

  1. Isn't a chain a manifold, and therefore a subset of a manifold? Why is that "differential forms cannot be integrated over subsets of the manifold"?
  2. Is integral of a differential form defined in terms of Lebesgue integral via parameterization of the chain, as like here

    $$\int_S \omega =\int_D \sum a_{i_1,\dots,i_k}(S({\mathbf u})) \frac{\partial(x^{i_1},\dots,x^{i_k})}{\partial(u^{1},\dots,u^{k})}\,du^1\ldots du^k $$

    So can one say that integral of a differential form is not a different integration method from Lebesgue integral?

Thanks and regards!

share|cite|improve this question
Related but not identical: – Willie Wong Aug 15 '11 at 15:48
@Tim: A chain is neither a manifold nor a submanifold. Rather, it is a formal sum of oriented submanifolds, possibly mutually intersecting (or with other pathologies). – Zhen Lin Aug 15 '11 at 16:04
up vote 10 down vote accepted
  1. Differential forms cannot be integrated over all subsets of a manifold. You cannot integrate a 2-form over a curve, or a 1-form over a surface. More precisely: integration in measure space is defined over a $\sigma$-algebra. So if integration is defined on two sets $A$ and $B$, the integral is also defined on $A\cap B$. But the same is not true for integration of differential forms. Given a two form $\omega$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$, and take $S$ and $T$ be two smooth surfaces that intersects transversally. $\int_S\omega$ and $\int_T\omega$ make sense, but not $\int_{S\cap T}\omega$.

  2. Generally a differential form, by definition, when taken in a local coordinate representation, is given by functions that are at least continuous. So in fact you don't need the machinery of Lebesgue integration: all the functions you are going to deal with can be treated with Riemann integration.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.