Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $R$ be an integrally closed domain. Then $R[x]$ is also integrally closed. Let $P$ be a prime ideal of $R[x]$ with the property that $P\cap R=\left\{ 0\right\} $ and $P$ contains a monic polynomial. Prove that $P$ is principal.

Help me a hint to prove.

Thank for any insight.

share|improve this question
    
To prove $P$ is principal, you need to show some element of $P$ divides every other element of $P$. What are the candidates for this job? –  hardmath Nov 20 '13 at 12:33
    
Can consider the minimal polynomial of $P$? –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 12:37
    
Help me. Please. –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 13:15
    
Hint: $P$ corresponds to a prime ideal in $Q(R)[x]$. –  Martin Brandenburg Nov 20 '13 at 13:15
    
What is $Q(R)[x]$? –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 13:22

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Suppose $P$ is a prime ideal of $R[x]$ that contains a monic polynomial and whose intersection with the base ring, integrally closed domain $R$, is trivial, $P \cap R = \{0\}$.

We are asked to prove that $P$ is principal. In other words we need to show $P$ contains an element that divides all the polynomials in $P$. What are the candidates?

We know that $P$ contains a monic polynomial, so let's start there. While $P$ will certainly contain more than one monic polynomial, we know that $P$ is a prime ideal. This suggests that we want to get at irreducibility of the monic polynomial.

One way to do this is by picking a monic polynomial of minimal degree in $P$. Note that since $P$ has trivial intersection with $R$, the degree of any polynomial in $P$ must be at least 1.

Now use the primality of $P$ to show that any monic polynomial $f$ of minimal degree in $P$ must be irreducible. Primality of $P$ means that if $f = gh$, either $g \in P$ or $h \in P$. If $f = gh$ is monic, then both $g,h$ are monic (up to multiplication by units). Thus $P$ would contain a monic polynomial of degree less than the degree of $f$; contradiction.

Finally, use some ideas from the division algorithm to show such $f$ divides every element of $P$.


At this point the fact $R$ is integrally closed comes into play. The Question connects this to $R[x]$ also being integrally closed. Though we are not asked to prove that, it bears noting it is an easy consequence of this:

Lemma Let domain $R$ be integrally closed in its field of quotients $k$. If $g,h \in k[x]$ are monic polynomials such that $gh \in R[x]$, then $g,h \in R[x]$.

If $R$ were a UFD, this could be considered a corollary of Gauss's lemma on polynomial irreducibility (see Prop. 1 here), but using the weaker assumption of being integrally closed is strengthened by assuming monicity of $gh$ over mere primitivity. A proof is sketched at the link above, but its brevity bears a few words of elaboration.

Proof of Lemma: In the algebraic closure $\overline{k}$ of $k$, we can fully factor $g = \Pi (x-a_i), h = \Pi (x-b_j)$, so that the coefficients of $g$ are (elementary symmetric) polynomial expressions in roots $a_i$, and similarly the coefficients of $h$ in roots $b_j$. Since the roots $a_i,b_j$ are also roots of monic polynomial $gh \in R[x]$, they are integral over $R$. Dedekind (1877) showed the integral elements over a domain form a ring (this is covered in J. Milne's Algebraic Number Theory, Chapt. 2), so the coefficients of $g$ (resp. of $h$) are also integral over $R$. But these coefficients are in $k$, and $R$ is integrally closed in $k$, so the polynomials $g,h$ are in $R[x]$. QED

Since prime ideal $P \subseteq R[x]$ contains no nonzero constant, by a standard argument $kP$ is a proper ideal of $k[x]$ and $kP \cap R[x] = P$. As $k[x]$ is a Euclidean domain (division algorithm, degree argument), there $kP$ is a principal ideal, say generated by monic polynomial $g$. Because $f \in P \subseteq kP$, $f = gh$ for some monic $h \in k[x]$. Then, according to the Lemma, $g \in kP \cap R[x] = P$ and by irreducibility of $f$, $f = g$.

Now apply the observation @user makes in a Comment above: Since $f$ is monic, any element of $P$ can be expressed as $qf + r \in R[x]$ "by division algorithm" where $\deg(r) \lt deg(f)$. However the same is true in Euclidean domain $k[x]$ where we see by uniqueness that $r=0$ (since $f=g$ generates $kP$). Thus $f$ divides every element of $P$ over $R[x]$, as we wished to show.

share|improve this answer
    
I need more details on the proof that any polynomial $f$ of minimal degree in $P$ must be irreducible. Can you explain more precisely to me? –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 13:51
    
Is that enough detail? –  hardmath Nov 20 '13 at 13:57
    
Yes it's enough. –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 14:04
    
For the proof that such $f$ divides every element of $P$, I don't understand why we can prove. The last time, can you explain more precisely to me? –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 14:11
1  
I think you can use the fact that $R[x]$ is an integrally closed domain. –  chuyenvien94 Nov 20 '13 at 14:18

Take $S=R-\{0\}$ and consider $S^{-1}(R[x])=(S^{-1}R)[x]$. (In the following denote by $K$ the field of fractions of $R$, that is $K=S^{-1}R$.) Then $S^{-1}P$ is prime in $K[x]$, so there exists $p\in K[x]$ monic such that $S^{-1}P=pK[x]$. Since $P$ contains a monic polynomial $f$ we get $f=pg$, $g\in K[x]$. Now use Gauss' lemma to get $p\in R[x]$ and prove that $P=pR[x]$.

share|improve this answer
1  
Why $S^{-1}R $ is prime in $K[x]$? –  chuyenvien94 Nov 20 '13 at 13:45
    
Since $P$ is prime in $R[x]$, $S^{-1}P$ is prime in $K[x]=S^{-1}R[x]$ –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 13:54
    
Ehm , of course. –  chuyenvien94 Nov 20 '13 at 14:22
    
@user: I need more details on the proof that $P=pR[x]$. Can you give me more details on it? –  user109584 Nov 20 '13 at 14:26
    
An element of $P$ is a multiple of $p$ in $K[x]$ and in the same time it's of the form $pq+r$ in $R[x]$ by division algorithm (this works since $p$ is monic). Now use the uniqueness of $q$ and $r$ in $K[x]$ and find $r=0$. –  user89712 Nov 20 '13 at 16:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.