Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $f(x)$ is the polynomial (coefficient of leading term is unity) in 'x' of least degree such that $f(1)=5 , f(2)=4, f(3)=3, f(4)=2, f(5)=1$

Then $f(0)= ?$

share|cite|improve this question

The naive approach via Lagrange yields $$f(0)=5\frac{(0-2)(0-3)(0-4)}{(1-2)(1-3)(1-4)}+4\frac{(0-1)(0-3)(0-4)}{(2-1)(2-3)(2-4)}+3\frac{(0-1)(0-2)(0-4)}{(3-1)(3-2)(3-4)}+2\frac{(0-1)(0-2)(0-3)}{(4-1)(4-2)(4-3)},$$ but this polynomial is just $-x+6$ ... Notice that the four points lay on a straight line hence the polynomial must have degree $4$ or more. Agent Vandermonde then finds $f(x)=x^4-10x^3+35x^2-51x+30$.

share|cite|improve this answer
This would be more convincing if you could show us the polynomial itself (just to be sure that its leading coefficient is really +1). – TonyK Nov 18 '13 at 12:04
You're right, my first guess was wrong ... – Michael Hoppe Nov 18 '13 at 12:35
how did you get this expression of f(x) ? – maths lover Nov 18 '13 at 17:12
@mathslover Via agent Vandermonde: by computing $\begin{pmatrix}1&1&1&1\\ 8&4&2&1\\ 27&9&3&1\\ 64&16&4&1\end{pmatrix}^{-1}\begin{pmatrix}4\\ -12\\ -78\\ -254\end{pmatrix}.$ – Michael Hoppe Nov 18 '13 at 17:44
i thing so f(5) is not equal to 1 – maths lover Nov 19 '13 at 14:43

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.