Sign up ×
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $M$ be a Noetherian $R$-module and $P^kM=0$ from some maximal ideal $P$ of $R$ and some integer $k$. How to show that $M$ has finite length?

The length of a module is defined to be the maximum length of the chain of submodule: $$ 0=M_0<M_1<\cdots<M_{n-1}<M_n=M $$

I have tried following. We can assume there is no strict submodule between $M_i$ and $M_{i+1}$, and try to prove such $n$ is bounded.

Then we have $$ M_i/M_{i+1}\cong R/Q_i $$

where $Q_i=\operatorname{ann}_R(M_i/M_{i+1})$ is maximal.

Then I cannot move on. I tried to look at the localization of the chain at $P$, but it seems to provide nothing.

Could anyone help?

share|cite|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

WLOG, choose $k$ to be the smallest possible. Consider the sequence of submodules

$$(*)\qquad0=MP^{k} \subsetneq MP^{k-1} \subsetneq \dots \subsetneq MP \subsetneq M \,.$$

The goal is to show that every consequtive factor of this sequence is of finite length.

For arbitrary $l \in \{0,1, \dots, k-1\},$ consider the factor $MP^l/MP^{l+1}$. Since $M$ is noetherian, this clearly is a finitely generated module. The annihilator $\mathrm{Ann}_R(MP^l/MP^{l+1})$ clearly contains the maximal ideal $P$. On the other hand, from the strictness of the inclusion $MP^{l+1} \subsetneq MP^{l}$ it follows that $1 \notin \mathrm{Ann}_R(MP^l/MP^{l+1})$, hence (since $P$ is maximal) $\mathrm{Ann}_R(MP^l/MP^{l+1})=P,$ a maximal ideal.

Now, since any module $N$ can be considered as $R/\mathrm{Ann}_R(N)$-module (with the multiplication defined by $n \cdot (r+\mathrm{Ann}_R(N)):=nr$ and the important property that the lattice of submodules does not change by this shift of perspective), we can see that $MP^l/MP^{l+1}$ is actually finitely-generated $R/P$-module, i.e. a vector space of finite dimension. Hence, it is of finite length.

Adding more details:

It is a well-known fact that a module $M$ is of finite length iff it has a finite composition series, i.e. a finite chain of submodules from $0$ to $M$ with the consecutive factors simple. Now, we have shown (for arbitrary $l$) that $MP^l/MP^{l+1}$ are of finite length, hence there exist a composition series $$0=MP^{l+1}/MP^{l+1}=N_0^{l} \subseteq N_{1}^{l} \subseteq \dots \subseteq N_{k_l}^{l}=MP^{l}/MP^{l+1}$$ with simple consecutive factors. After applying the correspondence theorem, we obtain a chain of submodules of $M$ $$MP^{l+1}=\overline{N_0^{l}}\subseteq \overline{N_1^{l}} \subseteq \dots \subseteq \overline{N_{k_l}^{l}}=MP^{l}$$ again with simple consecutive factors. Doing this for every $l$, we obtain a refinement of the series $(*)$ with simple consecutive factors of finite length, i.e. a composition series of module $M$ of finite length.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry but I think you only proved this specific chain has finite length. What about other chains? Isn't the length of a module the maximal length of all possible chains? – hxhxhx88 Nov 17 '13 at 21:54
Jordan - Hölder. – Martin Brandenburg Nov 17 '13 at 22:00
@hxhxhx88 Sorry, I thought this was clear. It uses the fact that module is of finite length if and only if it has a finite composition series. I will add a comment about it into the answer. – Pavel Čoupek Nov 17 '13 at 22:16

$P^kM=0$ implies $P^k\subset Ann_R(M)$. This shows that $R/Ann_R(M)$ is an artinian ring (its only prime ideal being $P/Ann_R(M)$), so $M$ is an artinian $R/Ann_R(M)$-module, that is, an artinian $R$-module and we are done.

share|cite|improve this answer
Sorry, your approach is too advanced. My commutative algebra course has't covered the Artinian ring yet..If it is possible, could you expand it a little bit? – hxhxhx88 Nov 17 '13 at 21:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.